Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33234063›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2020

Future climates: Markov blankets and active inference in the biosphere.

Sergio Rubin, Thomas Parr, Lancelot Da Costa, Karl Friston

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. An Active Inference Model of Collective Intelligence.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sergio RubinGeorges Lemaître Centre for Earth and Climate Research, Earth and Life Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain, Belgium.
Thomas ParrThe Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Lancelot Da CostaThe Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Karl FristonThe Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GBUCLouvain · BE

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 088130/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We formalize the Gaia hypothesis about the Earth climate system using advances in theoretical biology based on the minimization of variational free energy. This amounts to the claim that non-equilibrium steady-state dynamics-that underwrite our climate-depend on the Earth system possessing a Markov blanket. Our formalization rests on how the metabolic rates of the biosphere (understood as Markov blanket's internal states) change with respect to solar radiation at the Earth's surface (i.e. external states), through the changes in greenhouse and albedo effects (i.e. active states) and ocean-driven global temperature changes (i.e. sensory states). Describing the interaction between the metabolic rates and solar radiation as climatic states-in a Markov blanket-amounts to describing the dynamics of the internal states as actively inferring external states. This underwrites climatic non-equilibrium steady-state through free energy minimization and thus a form of planetary autopoiesis.

Indexed as

Earth, PlanetEntropyactive inferenceautopoiesisEarth's climate systemfree energy minimizationGaia hypothesis

Identifiers

PMID33234063
PMCPMC7729048
OpenAlexW3108903840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.