Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33233865›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Regulation of Glutamatergic Activity via Bidirectional Activation of Two Select Receptors as a Novel Approach in Antipsychotic Drug Discovery.

Paulina Cieślik, Joanna M Wierońska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. GABAMedComm · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Design and Synthesis of New Quinazolin-4-one Derivatives with Negative mGluInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. In Silico Screening of Novel α1-GABAInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paulina CieślikDepartment of Neurobiology, Maj Institute of Pharmacology Polish Academy of Sciences, 12 Smętna Street, 31-343 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1182-573X
Joanna M WierońskaDepartment of Neurobiology, Maj Institute of Pharmacology Polish Academy of Sciences, 12 Smętna Street, 31-343 Krakow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schizophrenia is a mental disorder that affects approximately 1-2% of the population and develops in early adulthood. The disease is characterized by positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms. A large percentage of patients with schizophrenia have a treatment-resistant disease, and the risk of developing adverse effects is high. Many researchers have attempted to introduce new antipsychotic drugs to the clinic, but most of these treatments failed, and the diversity of schizophrenic symptoms is one of the causes of disappointing results. The present review summarizes the results of our latest papers, showing that the simultaneous activation of two receptors with sub-effective doses of their ligands induces similar effects as the highest dose of each compound alone. The treatments were focused on inhibiting the increased glutamate release responsible for schizophrenia arousal, without interacting with dopamine (D

Indexed as

AnimalsAntipsychotic AgentsBrainDisease Models, AnimalDrug CombinationsDrug DiscoveryHumansMuscarinic AntagonistsReceptors, Metabotropic GlutamateReceptors, MuscarinicSchizophreniaAntipsychotic AgentsDrug CombinationsMuscarinic AntagonistsReceptors, Metabotropic GlutamateReceptors, MuscarinicGABAB receptormetabotropic glutamate receptorsmuscarinic receptorsschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID33233865
PMCPMC7699963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.