ReviewMicromachines2020
Random Error Reduction Algorithms for MEMS Inertial Sensor Accuracy Improvement-A Review.
Review in Micromachines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Bias Estimation for Low-Cost IMU IncludingSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Tendon Anomaly Identification in Prestressed Concrete Beams Based on an Advanced Monitoring MEMS and Data-Driven Detection of Structural Damage.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Noise Analysis and Suppression Methods for the Front-End Readout Circuit of a Microelectromechanical Systems Gyroscope.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Performance Improvement of Low-Cost Integrated Navigation Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Improving Accuracy of Real-Time Positioning and Path Tracking by Using an Error Compensation Algorithm against Walking Modes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Innovative Fusion Strategy for MEMS Redundant-IMU Exploiting Custom 3D Components.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Random Error Suppression Method Based on IGWPSO-ELM for Micromachined Silicon Resonant Accelerometers.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Research on Random Drift Model Identification and Error Compensation Method of MEMS Sensor Based on EEMD-GRNN.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Evaluation of 1D and 2D Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Driving Event Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- MEMS Inertial Sensor Calibration Technology: Current Status and Future Trends.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Recognizing Physical Activities for Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Using Wearable Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Orientation-Invariant Spatio-Temporal Gait Analysis Using Foot-Worn Inertial Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Hybrid Deep Recurrent Neural Networks for Noise Reduction of MEMS-IMU with Static and Dynamic Conditions.Micromachines · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research and industrial studies have indicated that small size, low cost, high precision, and ease of integration are vital features that characterize microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) inertial sensors for mass production and diverse applications. In recent times, sensors like MEMS accelerometers and MEMS gyroscopes have been sought in an increased application range such as medical devices for health care to defense and military weapons. An important limitation of MEMS inertial sensors is repeatedly documented as the ease of being influenced by environmental noise from random sources, along with mechanical and electronic artifacts in the underlying systems, and other random noise. Thus, random error processing is essential for proper elimination of artifact signals and improvement of the accuracy and reliability from such sensors. In this paper, a systematic review is carried out by investigating different random error signal processing models that have been recently developed for MEMS inertial sensor precision improvement. For this purpose, an in-depth literature search was performed on several databases viz., Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, Science Direct, and Association for Computing Machinery Digital Library. Forty-nine representative papers that focused on the processing of signals from MEMS accelerometers, MEMS gyroscopes, and MEMS inertial measuring units, published in journal or conference formats, and indexed on the databases within the last 10 years, were downloaded and carefully reviewed. From this literature overview, 30 mainstream algorithms were extracted and categorized into seven groups, which were analyzed to present the contributions, strengths, and weaknesses of the literature. Additionally, a summary of the models developed in the studies was presented, along with their working principles viz., application domain, and the conclusions made in the studies. Finally, the development trend of MEMS inertial sensor technology and its application prospects were presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.