ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020
A Review on Cementitious Self-Healing and the Potential of Phase-Field Methods for Modeling Crack-Closing and Fracture Recovery.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progress in Self-Repair Technology for Concrete Cracks via Biomineralization.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Preparation and Characterization of Electromagnetic-Induced Rupture Microcapsules for Self-Repairing Mortars.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Numerical Simulation of the Response of Concrete Structural Elements Containing a Self-Healing Agent.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improving the durability and sustainability of concrete structures has been driving the enormous number of research papers on self-healing mechanisms that have been published in the past decades. The vast developments of computer science significantly contributed to this and enhanced the various possibilities numerical simulations can offer to predict the entire service life, with emphasis on crack development and cementitious self-healing. The aim of this paper is to review the currently available literature on numerical methods for cementitious self-healing and fracture development using Phase-Field (PF) methods. The PF method is a computational method that has been frequently used for modeling and predicting the evolution of meso- and microstructural morphology of cementitious materials. It uses a set of conservative and non-conservative field variables to describe the phase evolutions. Unlike traditional sharp interface models, these field variables are continuous in the interfacial region, which is typical for PF methods. The present study first summarizes the various principles of self-healing mechanisms for cementitious materials, followed by the application of PF methods for simulating microscopic phase transformations. Then, a review on the various PF approaches for precipitation reaction and fracture mechanisms is reported, where the final section addresses potential key issues that may be considered in future developments of self-healing models. This also includes unified, combined and coupled multi-field models, which allow a comprehensive simulation of self-healing processes in cementitious materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.