Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33233349›Full record

ArticleGenes2020

Metagenomic Information Recovery from Human Stool Samples Is Influenced by Sequencing Depth and Profiling Method.

Tasha M Santiago-Rodriguez, Aaron Garoutte, Emmase Adams, Waleed Nasser, Matthew C Ross, Alex La Reau, Zachariah Henseler, Tonya Ward, Dan Knights, Joseph F Petrosino and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Capturing clinically relevantMicrobial genomics · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Detection ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tasha M Santiago-RodriguezDiversigen Inc., Houston, TX 77021, USA.
Aaron GaroutteDiversigen Inc., Houston, TX 77021, USA.
Emmase AdamsDiversigen Inc., Houston, TX 77021, USA.
Waleed NasserDiversigen Inc., Houston, TX 77021, USA.
Matthew C RossAlkek Center for Metagenomics and Microbiome Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7621-8829
Alex La ReauDiversigen Inc., Saint Paul, MN 55112, USA.
Zachariah HenselerDiversigen Inc., Saint Paul, MN 55112, USA.
Tonya WardDiversigen Inc., Saint Paul, MN 55112, USA.
Dan KnightsDiversigen Inc., Saint Paul, MN 55112, USA.
Joseph F PetrosinoDiversigen Inc., Houston, TX 77021, USA.
Emily B HollisterDiversigen Inc., Houston, TX 77021, USA.
Diversitech (United States) · USBaylor College of Medicine · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene (16S) has long been a go-to method for microbiome characterization due to its accessibility and lower cost compared to shotgun metagenomic sequencing (SMS). However, 16S sequencing rarely provides species-level resolution and cannot provide direct assessment of other taxa (e.g., viruses and fungi) or functional gene content. Shallow shotgun metagenomic sequencing (SSMS) has emerged as an approach to bridge the gap between 16S sequencing and deep metagenomic sequencing. SSMS is cost-competitive with 16S sequencing, while also providing species-level resolution and functional gene content insights. In the present study, we evaluated the effects of sequencing depth on marker gene-mapping- and alignment-based annotation of bacteria in healthy human stool samples. The number of identified taxa decreased with lower sequencing depths, particularly with the marker gene-mapping-based approach. Other annotations, including viruses and pathways, also showed a depth-dependent effect on feature recovery. These results refine the understanding of the suitability and shortcomings of SSMS, as well as annotation tools for metagenomic analyses in human stool samples. Results may also translate to other sample types and may open the opportunity to explore the effect of sequencing depth and annotation method.

Indexed as

BacteriaFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGenetic MarkersHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMetagenomeMetagenomicsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNAVirusesGenetic MarkersRNA, Ribosomal, 16Salignmentmarker genemicrobiomeshallow sequencingshotgun metagenomic sequencingvirome

Identifiers

PMID33233349
PMCPMC7700633
OpenAlexW3100033012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.