ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2021
Computational prediction of species-specific yeast DNA replication origin via iterative feature representation.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interpretable prediction of DNA replication origins in S. cerevisiae using DNABERT and DNABERT-2.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Computational prediction of replication origins: a comparative review of methods, benchmarks, and trends from heuristics to deep learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Advancing the accuracy of tyrosinase inhibitory peptides prediction via a multiview feature fusion strategy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Long extrachromosomal circular DNA identification by fusing sequence-derived features of physicochemical properties and nucleotide distribution patterns.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Meta-2OM: A multi-classifier meta-model for the accurate prediction of RNA 2'-O-methylation sites in human RNA.PloS one · 2024Article
- H2Opred: a robust and efficient hybrid deep learning model for predicting 2'-O-methylation sites in human RNA.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Empirical comparison and recent advances of computational prediction of hormone binding proteins using machine learning methods.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Accurately identifying hemagglutinin using sequence information and machine learning methods.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Clarion is a multi-label problem transformation method for identifying mRNA subcellular localizations.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- TACOS: a novel approach for accurate prediction of cell-specific long noncoding RNAs subcellular localization.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Integrating LASSO Feature Selection and Soft Voting Classifier to Identify Origins of Replication Sites.Current genomics · 2022Article
- Accurate Identification of DNA Replication Origin by Fusing Epigenomics and Chromatin Interaction Information.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2022Article
- Article
- IRC-Fuse: improved and robust prediction of redox-sensitive cysteine by fusing of multiple feature representations.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2021Article
- PUP-Fuse: Prediction of Protein Pupylation Sites by Integrating Multiple Sequence Representations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deoxyribonucleic acid replication is one of the most crucial tasks taking place in the cell, and it has to be precisely regulated. This process is initiated in the replication origins (ORIs), and thus it is essential to identify such sites for a deeper understanding of the cellular processes and functions related to the regulation of gene expression. Considering the important tasks performed by ORIs, several experimental and computational approaches have been developed in the prediction of such sites. However, existing computational predictors for ORIs have certain curbs, such as building only single-feature encoding models, limited systematic feature engineering efforts and failure to validate model robustness. Hence, we developed a novel species-specific yeast predictor called yORIpred that accurately identify ORIs in the yeast genomes. To develop yORIpred, we first constructed optimal 40 baseline models by exploring eight different sequence-based encodings and five different machine learning classifiers. Subsequently, the predicted probability of 40 models was considered as the novel feature vector and carried out iterative feature learning approach independently using five different classifiers. Our systematic analysis revealed that the feature representation learned by the support vector machine algorithm (yORIpred) could well discriminate the distribution characteristics between ORIs and non-ORIs when compared with the other four algorithms. Comprehensive benchmarking experiments showed that yORIpred achieved superior and stable performance when compared with the existing predictors on the same training datasets. Furthermore, independent evaluation showcased the best and accurate performance of yORIpred thus underscoring the significance of iterative feature representation. To facilitate the users in obtaining their desired results without undergoing any mathematical, statistical or computational hassles, we developed a web server for the yORIpred predictor, which is available at: http://thegleelab.org/yORIpred.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.