Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33232772›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2021

Isotoxic Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Feasibility Study.

Kate Haslett, Neil Bayman, Kevin Franks, Nicki Groom, Susan V Harden, Catherine Harris, Gerard Hanna, Stephen Harrow, Matthew Hatton, Paula McCloskey and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Kate HaslettThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust Wilmslow Road, Manchester, United Kingdom; Department of Radiotherapy Related Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Neil BaymanThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust Wilmslow Road, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Kevin FranksLeeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Nicki GroomRadiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Team, Mount Vernon Hospital, Rickmansworth Road, Northwood, United Kingdom.
Susan V HardenDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrookes Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Catherine HarrisThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust Wilmslow Road, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Gerard HannaCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Stephen HarrowDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Matthew HattonDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Weston Park Hospital, Whitham Road, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Paula McCloskeyDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Fiona McDonaldDepartment of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, London, United Kingdom.
W David RyderManchester Clinical Trials Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Corinne Faivre-FinnThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust Wilmslow Road, Manchester, United Kingdom; Department of Radiotherapy Related Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom. Electronic address: corinne.finn@nhs.net.
University of Manchester · GBThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBBelfast Health and Social Care Trust · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBMount Vernon Hospital · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe University of Melbourne · AUWeston Park Cancer Centre · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK C17052/A15702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNot all patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are suitable for concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Local failure rate is high for sequential concurrent CRT. As such, there is a rationale for treatment intensification. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Isotoxic intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is a multicenter feasibility study that combines different intensification strategies including hyperfractionation, acceleration, and dose escalation facilitated by IMRT. Patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 to 2, and unsuitable for concurrent CRT were recruited. A minimum of 2 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy was compulsory before starting radiation therapy (RT). Radiation dose was increased until a maximum dose of 79.2 Gy was reached or 1 or more of the organs at risk met predefined constraints. RT was delivered in 1.8-Gy fractions twice daily, and an RT quality assurance program was implemented. The primary objective was the delivery of isotoxic IMRT to a dose >60 Gy equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2 assuming an α/β ratio of 10 Gy for acute reacting tissues).

resultsThirty-seven patients were recruited from 7 UK centers. Median age was 69.9 years (range, 46-86 years). The male-to-female ratio was 17:18. ECOG PS was 0 to 5 in 14.2% of patients; PS was 1 to 27 in 77.1% of patients; PS was 2 to 3 in 8.6% of patients. Stage IIIA:IIIB ratio was 22:13 (62.9%:37.1%). Of 37 patients, 2 (5.4%) failed to achieve EQD2 > 60 Gy. Median prescribed tumor dose was 77.4 Gy (range, 61.2-79.2 Gy). A maximum dose of 79.2Gy was achieved in 14 patients (37.8%). Grade 3 esophagitis was reported in 2 patients, and no patients developed grade 3 to 4 pneumonitis. There were 3 grade 5 events: acute radiation pneumonitis, bronchopulmonary hemorrhage, and acute lung infection. Median follow-up at time of analysis was 25.4 months (range, 8.0-44.2) months for 11 of 35 survivors. The median survival was 18.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.9-30.6), 2-year overall survival was 33.6% (95% CI, 17.9-50.1), and progression-free survival was 23.9% (95% CI, 11.3-39.1).

conclusionsIsotoxic IMRT is a well-tolerated and feasible approach to treatment intensification.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungChemoradiotherapyContraindicationsDose Fractionation, RadiationEsophagitisFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedOrgans at RiskPlatinum CompoundsPrecision MedicinePlatinum Compounds

Identifiers

PMID33232772
PMCPMC7955281
OpenAlexW3108513315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.