Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33232585›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2021

Disparities in the characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure admitted to internal medicine and cardiology departments: a single-centre, retrospective cohort study.

Shiri Lea Maymon, Gil Moravsky, Gil Marcus, Mony Shuvy, David Pereg, Danny Epstein, Ilya Litovchik, Shmuel Fuchs, Sa'ar Minha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Temporal trends in acute decompensated heart failure outcomes: A single-center 11-year retrospective analysis.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shiri Lea MaymonSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.
Gil MoravskySackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.
Gil MarcusSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-5719-7225
Mony ShuvyHeart Institute, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-8351-3068
David PeregSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7989-5817
Danny EpsteinDepartment of Internal Medicine 'B', Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-7032-7007
Ilya LitovchikSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1424-5597
Shmuel FuchsSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.
Sa'ar MinhaSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-1360-5733

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsEfforts are constantly made to decrease the rates of readmission after acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). ADHF admissions to internal medicine departments (IMD) were previously associated with higher risk for readmission compared with those admitted to cardiology departments (CD). It is unknown if the earlier still applies after recent advancement in care over the last decade. This contemporary cohort compares characteristics and outcomes of ADHF patients admitted to IMD with those admitted to CD. METHODS AND

resultsThe data for this single-centre, retrospective study utilized a cohort of 8332 ADHF patients admitted between 2007 and 2017. We compared patients' baseline characteristics and clinical and laboratory indices of patients admitted to CD and IMD with the outcome defined as 30 day readmission rate. In comparison with those admitted to CD, patients admitted to IMD (89.5% of patients) were older (79 [70-86] vs. 69 [60-78] years; P < 0.001) and had a higher incidence of co-morbidities and a higher ejection fraction. Readmission rates at 30 days were significantly lower in patients admitted to CD (15.9% vs. 19.6%; P = 0.01). Conflicting results of three statistical models failed to associate between the admitting department and 30 day readmission (odds ratio for 30 day readmission in CD: forced and backward stepwise logistic regression 0.8, 95% confidence interval 0.65-0.97, P = 0.02; stabilized inverse probability weights model odds ratio 1.0, confidence interval 0.75-1.37, P = 0.96).

conclusionsThis contemporary analysis of ADHF patient cohort demonstrates significant differences in the characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to IMD and CD. Thus, focusing strategies for readmission prevention in patients admitted to IMD may be beneficial.

Indexed as

CardiologyHeart FailureAcute DiseaseHumansInternal MedicineRetrospective Studies30 day readmissionCardiologyHeart failureInternal medicineMortalityQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID33232585
PMCPMC7835581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.