ArticleMedical physics2021
Multi-marker quantitative radiomics for mass characterization in dedicated breast CT imaging.
Article in Medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Segmentation variability and radiomics stability for predicting triple-negative breast cancer subtype using magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- A deep learning model based on chest CT to predict benign and malignant breast masses and axillary lymph node metastasis.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Article
- Gradient-Based Radiomics for Outcome Prediction and Decision-Making in PULSAR: A Preliminary Study.International journal of particle therapy · 2025Article
- Multiomics-Based Outcome Prediction in Personalized Ultra-Fractionated Stereotactic Adaptive Radiotherapy (PULSAR).Cancers · 2024Article
- Radiomics in cone-beam breast CT for the prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: a multi-center multi-device study.European radiology · 2024Article
- Potential added value of computed tomography radiomics to multimodal prediction models for benign and malignant breast tumors.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
- Radiomics nomogram for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis-a potential method to address the limitation of axilla coverage in cone-beam breast CT: a bi-center retrospective study.La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- Review
- Article
- AI-Based Cancer Detection Model for Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Four-Dimensional Machine Learning Radiomics for the Pretreatment Assessment of Breast Cancer Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2023Article
- Predictive Value ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Dedicated breast CT: state of the art-Part II. Clinical application and future outlook.European radiology · 2022Review
- Computer-aided diagnosis of masses in breast computed tomography imaging: deep learning model with combined handcrafted and convolutional radiomic features.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop and evaluate the diagnostic performance of an algorithm for multi-marker radiomic-based classification of breast masses in dedicated breast computed tomography (bCT) images.
methodsOver 1000 radiomic descriptors aimed at quantifying mass and border heterogeneity, morphology, and margin sharpness were developed and implemented. These included well-established texture and shape feature descriptors, which were supplemented with additional approaches for contour irregularity quantification, spicule and lobe detection, characterization of degree of infiltration, and differences in peritumoral compartments. All descriptors were extracted from a training set of 202 bCT masses (133 benign and 69 malignant), and their individual diagnostic performance was investigated in terms of area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (AUC) of single-feature-based linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classifiers. Subsequently, the most relevant descriptors were selected through a multiple-step feature selection process (including stability analysis, statistical significance, evaluation of feature interaction, and dimensionality reduction), and used to develop a final LDA radiomic model for classification of benign and malignant masses, which was then tested on an independent test set of 82 cases (45 benign and 37 malignant).
resultsThe majority of the individual radiomic descriptors showed, on the training set, an AUC value deriving from a linear decision boundary higher than 0.65, with the lower limit of the associated 95% confidence interval (C.I.) not overlapping with random chance (AUC = 0.5). The final LDA radiomic model resulted in a test set AUC of 0.90 (95% C.I. 0.80-0.96).
conclusionsThe proposed multi-marker radiomic approach achieved high diagnostic accuracy in bCT mass classification, using a radiomic signature based on different feature types. While future studies with larger datasets are needed to further validate these results, quantitative radiomics applied to bCT shows potential to improve the breast cancer diagnosis pipeline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.