ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2021
Comparison between low cost USB nailfold capillaroscopy and videocapillaroscopy: a pilot study.
Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nailfold capillaroscopy in diabetic retinopathy: microvascular insights, clinical value, and translational challenges - a narrative review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- CAPoxy: A feasibility study to investigate multispectral imaging in nailfold capillaroscopy.PloS one · 2026Article
- Insight from convergent validity of assessment of systemic sclerosis-associated Raynaud phenomenon with nailfold capillaroscopy.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2025Article
- Methods of Assessing Nailfold Capillaroscopy Compared to Video Capillaroscopy in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis-A Critical Review of the Literature.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A deep learning system for quantitative assessment of microvascular abnormalities in nailfold capillary images.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Nailfold capillaroscopy: a survey of current UK practice and 'next steps' to increase uptake among rheumatologists.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Detection of microvascular changes in systemic sclerosis and other rheumatic diseases.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2021Review
- Nailfold capillaroscopy by smartphone-dermatoscope for connective tissue disease diagnosis in interstitial lung disease: a prospective observational study.ERJ open research · 2021Article
- Exoscope-based videocapillaroscopy system forBiomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Nailfold Capillaroscopy With USB Digital Microscopy in Connective Tissue Diseases: A Comparative Study of 245 Patients and Healthy Controls.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesUniversal serial bus (USB) microscopy (capillaroscopy) could provide all rheumatologists with an easy-to-use, low-cost tool to examine the nailfold capillaries to facilitate early diagnosis of SSc. The objectives of this pilot study were to examine the feasibility of acquiring and analysing images using USB microscopy and to compare results to videocapillaroscopy.
methodsVideocapillaroscopy and USB microscope images were obtained from the right and left ring fingers of 20 patients with SSc and 20 healthy control subjects. In addition to generating panoramic capillary mosaics from across the whole nailbed, custom software made fully automated measurements of vessel structure including capillary width and density. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AZ) was used to measure separation between the SSc and healthy control groups.
resultsHigh quality images could be generated from the USB microscope, with reconstructed USB images comparing very favourably with those obtained using videocapillaroscopy. Using USB microscope images, the receiver operating characteristic curve AZ for group separation based on mean width was 0.81 (standard error 0.120) compared with 0.81 (standard error 0.095) for the (gold standard) videocapillaroscopy. The receiver operating characteristic curve AZ for group separation using capillary density was 0.48 (standard error 0.16) for USB microscope images, compared with 0.70 (standard error 0.10) for videocapillaroscopy.
conclusionIn this pilot study, USB capillaroscopy was able to discriminate between patients with SSc and controls as well as videocapillaroscopy on the basis of capillary width. This finding, together with the high-quality images obtained, highlights the potential of USB capillaroscopy as a low-cost, easily accessible clinical and research tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.