Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33232464›Full record

ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2021

Comparison between low cost USB nailfold capillaroscopy and videocapillaroscopy: a pilot study.

Michael Berks, Graham Dinsdale, Elizabeth Marjanovic, Andrea Murray, Chris Taylor, Ariane L Herrick

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Exoscope-based videocapillaroscopy system forBiomedical optics express · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael BerksCentre for Imaging Sciences, Division of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Graham DinsdaleDivision of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6245-2721
Elizabeth MarjanovicDivision of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Andrea MurrayDivision of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Chris TaylorCentre for Imaging Sciences, Division of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Ariane L HerrickDivision of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4941-7926
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_15038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesUniversal serial bus (USB) microscopy (capillaroscopy) could provide all rheumatologists with an easy-to-use, low-cost tool to examine the nailfold capillaries to facilitate early diagnosis of SSc. The objectives of this pilot study were to examine the feasibility of acquiring and analysing images using USB microscopy and to compare results to videocapillaroscopy.

methodsVideocapillaroscopy and USB microscope images were obtained from the right and left ring fingers of 20 patients with SSc and 20 healthy control subjects. In addition to generating panoramic capillary mosaics from across the whole nailbed, custom software made fully automated measurements of vessel structure including capillary width and density. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AZ) was used to measure separation between the SSc and healthy control groups.

resultsHigh quality images could be generated from the USB microscope, with reconstructed USB images comparing very favourably with those obtained using videocapillaroscopy. Using USB microscope images, the receiver operating characteristic curve AZ for group separation based on mean width was 0.81 (standard error 0.120) compared with 0.81 (standard error 0.095) for the (gold standard) videocapillaroscopy. The receiver operating characteristic curve AZ for group separation using capillary density was 0.48 (standard error 0.16) for USB microscope images, compared with 0.70 (standard error 0.10) for videocapillaroscopy.

conclusionIn this pilot study, USB capillaroscopy was able to discriminate between patients with SSc and controls as well as videocapillaroscopy on the basis of capillary width. This finding, together with the high-quality images obtained, highlights the potential of USB capillaroscopy as a low-cost, easily accessible clinical and research tool.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMicroscopic AngioscopyMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsScleroderma, Systemicnailfold capillaroscopySScUSB microscopevideocapillaroscopy

Identifiers

PMID33232464
PMCPMC8328506
OpenAlexW3109447756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.