Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33232347›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Data analysis and modeling pipelines for controlled networked social science experiments.

Vanessa Cedeno-Mieles, Zhihao Hu, Yihui Ren, Xinwei Deng, Noshir Contractor, Saliya Ekanayake, Joshua M Epstein, Brian J Goode, Gizem Korkmaz, Chris J Kuhlman and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Vanessa Cedeno-MielesDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0475-9420
Zhihao HuDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.
Yihui RenComputational Science Initiative, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, United States of America.
Xinwei DengDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.
Noshir ContractorDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States of America.
Saliya EkanayakeLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States of America.
Joshua M EpsteinDepartment of Epidemiology, New York University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Brian J GoodeBiocomplexity Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.
Gizem KorkmazBiocomplexity Institute & Initiative, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America.
Chris J KuhlmanBiocomplexity Institute & Initiative, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America.
Dustin MachiBiocomplexity Institute & Initiative, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America.
Michael MacyDepartment of Sociology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States of America.
Madhav V MaratheBiocomplexity Institute & Initiative, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America.
Naren RamakrishnanDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.
Parang SarafDiscovery Analytics Center, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.
Nathan SelfDiscovery Analytics Center, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is large interest in networked social science experiments for understanding human behavior at-scale. Significant effort is required to perform data analytics on experimental outputs and for computational modeling of custom experiments. Moreover, experiments and modeling are often performed in a cycle, enabling iterative experimental refinement and data modeling to uncover interesting insights and to generate/refute hypotheses about social behaviors. The current practice for social analysts is to develop tailor-made computer programs and analytical scripts for experiments and modeling. This often leads to inefficiencies and duplication of effort. In this work, we propose a pipeline framework to take a significant step towards overcoming these challenges. Our contribution is to describe the design and implementation of a software system to automate many of the steps involved in analyzing social science experimental data, building models to capture the behavior of human subjects, and providing data to test hypotheses. The proposed pipeline framework consists of formal models, formal algorithms, and theoretical models as the basis for the design and implementation. We propose a formal data model, such that if an experiment can be described in terms of this model, then our pipeline software can be used to analyze data efficiently. The merits of the proposed pipeline framework is elaborated by several case studies of networked social science experiments.

Indexed as

Electronic Data ProcessingModels, TheoreticalSocial BehaviorSoftwareAlgorithmsHumansSocial Sciences

Identifiers

PMID33232347
PMCPMC7685486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.