Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33232325›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

3 versus 7 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging for parcellations of subcortical brain structures in clinical settings.

Bethany R Isaacs, Martijn J Mulder, Josephine M Groot, Nikita van Berendonk, Nicky Lute, Pierre-Louis Bazin, Birte U Forstmann, Anneke Alkemade

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Multiscale characterization of the human claustrum from histology to MRI.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Leveraging ultra-high field (7T) MRI in psychiatric research.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Architecture of the subthalamic nucleus.Communications biology · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Deep Learning Segmentation of the Nucleus Basalis of Meynert on 3T MRI.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Phenotyping Superagers Using Resting-State fMRI.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Nonparametric 5D D-RJournal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bethany R IsaacsUniversity of Amsterdam, Integrative Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8931-377X
Martijn J MulderUniversity of Amsterdam, Integrative Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9640-4322
Josephine M GrootUniversity of Amsterdam, Integrative Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nikita van BerendonkUniversity of Amsterdam, Integrative Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicky LuteUniversity of Amsterdam, Integrative Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3954-522X
Pierre-Louis BazinUniversity of Amsterdam, Integrative Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Birte U ForstmannUniversity of Amsterdam, Integrative Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anneke AlkemadeUniversity of Amsterdam, Integrative Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3234-353X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

7 Tesla (7T) magnetic resonance imaging holds great promise for improved visualization of the human brain for clinical purposes. To assess whether 7T is superior regarding localization procedures of small brain structures, we compared manual parcellations of the red nucleus, subthalamic nucleus, substantia nigra, globus pallidus interna and externa. These parcellations were created on a commonly used clinical anisotropic clinical 3T with an optimized isotropic (o)3T and standard 7T scan. The clinical 3T MRI scans did not allow delineation of an anatomically plausible structure due to its limited spatial resolution. o3T and 7T parcellations were directly compared. We found that 7T outperformed the o3T MRI as reflected by higher Dice scores, which were used as a measurement of interrater agreement for manual parcellations on quantitative susceptibility maps. This increase in agreement was associated with higher contrast to noise ratios for smaller structures, but not for the larger globus pallidus segments. Additionally, control-analyses were performed to account for potential biases in manual parcellations by assessing semi-automatic parcellations. These results showed a higher consistency for structure volumes for 7T compared to optimized 3T which illustrates the importance of the use of isotropic voxels for 3D visualization of the surgical target area. Together these results indicate that 7T outperforms c3T as well as o3T given the constraints of a clinical setting.

Indexed as

AdultBrainFemaleGlobus PallidusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRed NucleusSubstantia NigraSubthalamic NucleusYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33232325
PMCPMC7685480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.