Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33232210›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2021

Parental vaccine attitudes, beliefs, and practices: initial evidence in California after a vaccine policy change.

Taylor A Holroyd, Amanda C Howa, Paul L Delamater, Nicola P Klein, Alison M Buttenheim, Rupali J Limaye, Tina M Proveaux, Saad B Omer, Daniel A Salmon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Taylor A HolroydDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1907-2218
Amanda C HowaHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Paul L DelamaterDepartment of Geography and Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3627-9739
Nicola P KleinKaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1777-4814
Alison M ButtenheimDepartment of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Rupali J LimayeDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3883-9720
Tina M ProveauxDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Saad B OmerYale Institute for Global Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Daniel A SalmonDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Impact of eliminating nonmedical exemptions in CaliforniaR01AI125405 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWARTZ, JASON LEE · 2016 to 2020
$3.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI125405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Senate Bill 277 (SB277) eliminated nonmedical exemptions for school-entry vaccines in California, but the impact of parental vaccine knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs on vaccine decision-making has not been extensively examined within the post-SB277 context. This study generates preliminary understanding and discussion of the vaccination knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs among a pilot population of parents of kindergarten students in California after the implementation of SB277. School officials administered a cross-sectional survey to parents of kindergarten children in California from April to July 2019. Parents reported their perceptions of diseases and vaccines, key immunization beliefs, and confidence in different sources of vaccine information. Most parents (92%) had fully vaccinated their children post-SB277 and generally perceived vaccines to be safe and effective, but about 44% reported they were hesitant about childhood vaccines. The majority of parents (87%) rated vaccine information from their doctor as highly credible. This pilot group of kindergarten parents was generally supportive of vaccination and had fully vaccinated their children, but most parents still harbored concerns and misconceptions about vaccines and about public health authorities. This indicates a disconnect between parental vaccine compliance and confidence, and suggests that educational interventions could impact parental vaccine behavior and decision-making.

Indexed as

VaccinesAttitudeCaliforniaChildCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansParentsPolicyVaccinationVaccinesCaliforniainfectious diseaseschool immunization lawstate lawVaccine hesitancyvaccine policy

Identifiers

PMID33232210
PMCPMC8115753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.