Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33231952›Full record

ArticleThe journal of trauma and acute care surgery2020

Downstream hospital system effects of a comprehensive trauma recovery services program.

Belinda DeMario, Mark J Kalina, Evelyn Truong, Sarah Hendrickson, Esther S Tseng, Jeffrey A Claridge, Heather Vallier, Vanessa P Ho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Recidivism after orthopaedic trauma has diminished over time.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Belinda DeMarioFrom the Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Burn, and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (B.D., E.T., E.S.T., J.A.C., V.P.H.), Community Trauma Institute (B.D., M.J.K., S.H., H.V.), and Department of Orthopedic Surgery (H.V.), MetroHealth Medical Center; and Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences (V.P.H.), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Mark J Kalina
Evelyn Truong
Sarah Hendrickson
Esther S Tseng
Jeffrey A Claridge
Heather Vallier
Vanessa P Ho

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002547 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DWEIK, RAED A. · 2018 to 2022
$7.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrauma patients are often noted to have poor compliance but high recidivism and readmission rates. Participation in a trauma recovery services (TRS) program, which provides peer support and other psychosocial resources, may impact the trajectory of patient recovery by decreasing barriers to follow-up. We hypothesized that TRS participants would have greater downstream nonemergent use of our hospital system over the year following trauma, manifested by more positive encounters, fewer negative encounters, and lower emergency department (ED) charges.

methodsWe studied trauma survivors (March 2017 to March 2018) offered TRS. Hospital encounters and charges 1 year from index admission were compared between patients who accepted and declined TRS. Positive encounters were defined as outpatient visits and planned admissions; negative encounters were defined as no shows, ED visits, and unplanned admissions. Charges were grouped as cumulative ED and non-ED charges (including outpatient and subsequent admission charges). Adjusted logistic and linear regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with positive/negative encounters and ED charges.

resultsOf 511 identified patients (68% male; injury severity score, 14 [9-19]), 362 (71%) accepted TRS. Trauma recovery services patients were older, had higher injury severity, and longer index admission length of stay (all p < 0.05). After adjusting for confounders, TRS patients were more likely to have at least one positive encounter and were similarly likely to have negative encounters as patients who declined services. Total aggregate charges for this group was US $74 million, of which US $30 million occurred downstream of the index admission. Accepting TRS was associated with lower ED charges.

conclusionA comprehensive TRS program including education, peer mentors, and a support network may provide value to the patient and the health care system by reducing subsequent care provided by the ED in the year after a trauma without affecting nonemergent care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, level IV.

Indexed as

AdultEfficiency, OrganizationalEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHealth ServicesHospital ChargesHospitalizationHumansInjury Severity ScoreMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareRecovery of FunctionRegression AnalysisRetrospective StudiesSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID33231952
PMCPMC7871439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.