ArticleThe journal of trauma and acute care surgery2020
Downstream hospital system effects of a comprehensive trauma recovery services program.
Article in The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward hypothermia in severe trauma patients among healthcare professionals in emergency departments and trauma centers in Shanghai: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Mental health resources for orthopaedic trauma patient care: a survey of orthopaedic trauma association members.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025Article
- CORR Insights®: Gunshot Trauma Patients Have Higher Risk of PTSD Compared With Blunt Trauma and Elective Populations: A Retrospective Comparative Study of Outpatient Orthopaedic Care.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2024Article
- Pediatric Trauma Recidivism: A Statewide Risk Factor Analysis of the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission (HSCRC).Journal of pediatric surgery · 2024Article
- Follow-up after major traumatic injury: a survey of services in Australian and New Zealand public hospitals.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Article
- A prospective assessment of resilience in trauma patients using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale.Surgery · 2023Article
- Post-Trauma Discharge Instructions: Are We Dropping the Ball?The American surgeon · 2023Review
- Article
- Recidivism after orthopaedic trauma has diminished over time.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023Article
- In their own words: recovery after emergency general surgery in the older patient.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2023Article
- Scoping review of the literature to ascertain how follow-up care is provided to major trauma patients post discharge from acute care.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Understanding barriers and facilitators to implementation of psychosocial care within orthopedic trauma centers: a qualitative study with multidisciplinary stakeholders from geographically diverse settings.Implementation science communications · 2021Article
- Trauma-informed care: recognizing and resisting re-traumatization in health care.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTrauma patients are often noted to have poor compliance but high recidivism and readmission rates. Participation in a trauma recovery services (TRS) program, which provides peer support and other psychosocial resources, may impact the trajectory of patient recovery by decreasing barriers to follow-up. We hypothesized that TRS participants would have greater downstream nonemergent use of our hospital system over the year following trauma, manifested by more positive encounters, fewer negative encounters, and lower emergency department (ED) charges.
methodsWe studied trauma survivors (March 2017 to March 2018) offered TRS. Hospital encounters and charges 1 year from index admission were compared between patients who accepted and declined TRS. Positive encounters were defined as outpatient visits and planned admissions; negative encounters were defined as no shows, ED visits, and unplanned admissions. Charges were grouped as cumulative ED and non-ED charges (including outpatient and subsequent admission charges). Adjusted logistic and linear regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with positive/negative encounters and ED charges.
resultsOf 511 identified patients (68% male; injury severity score, 14 [9-19]), 362 (71%) accepted TRS. Trauma recovery services patients were older, had higher injury severity, and longer index admission length of stay (all p < 0.05). After adjusting for confounders, TRS patients were more likely to have at least one positive encounter and were similarly likely to have negative encounters as patients who declined services. Total aggregate charges for this group was US $74 million, of which US $30 million occurred downstream of the index admission. Accepting TRS was associated with lower ED charges.
conclusionA comprehensive TRS program including education, peer mentors, and a support network may provide value to the patient and the health care system by reducing subsequent care provided by the ED in the year after a trauma without affecting nonemergent care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.