Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33231895›Full record

ArticleJournal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine2021

On the Impact of Different Lung Ultrasound Imaging Protocols in the Evaluation of Patients Affected by Coronavirus Disease 2019: How Many Acquisitions Are Needed?

Federico Mento, Tiziano Perrone, Veronica Narvena Macioce, Francesco Tursi, Danilo Buonsenso, Elena Torri, Andrea Smargiassi, Riccardo Inchingolo, Gino Soldati, Libertario Demi

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Lung Ultrasound Score in COVID-19 Patients Correlates with POThe western journal of emergency medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. New International Guidelines and Consensus on the Use of Lung Ultrasound.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Lung Ultrasound in COVID-19 and Post-COVID-19 Patients, an Evidence-Based Approach.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. What Is COVID 19 Teaching Us about Pulmonary Ultrasound?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Federico MentoDepartment of Information Engineering and Computer Science, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6571-7809
Tiziano PerroneDepartment of Internal Medicine, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Veronica Narvena MacioceDivision of Respiratory Diseases, Ospedale Maggiore di Lodi, Lodi, Italy.
Francesco TursiDivision of Respiratory Diseases, Ospedale Maggiore di Lodi, Lodi, Italy.
Danilo BuonsensoDepartment of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8567-2639
Elena TorriBresciaMed, Brescia, Italy.
Andrea SmargiassiRespiratory Medicine Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0637-7282
Riccardo InchingoloRespiratory Medicine Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2843-9966
Gino SoldatiDiagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound Unit, Valle del Serchio Hospital District, Lucca, Italy.
Libertario DemiDepartment of Information Engineering and Computer Science, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0635-2133

Funding

European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) Project UltraOn, call EIT Digital 2020Fondazione VRT Call COVID-19 2020 Grant #1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung ultrasound (LUS) is currently being extensively used for the evaluation of patients affected by coronavirus disease 2019. In the past months, several imaging protocols have been proposed in the literature. However, how the different protocols would compare when applied to the same patients had not been investigated yet. To this end, in this multicenter study, we analyzed the outcomes of 4 different LUS imaging protocols, respectively based on 4, 8, 12, and 14 LUS acquisitions, on data from 88 patients. Results show how a 12-area acquisition system seems to be a good tradeoff between the acquisition time and accuracy.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansLungMulticenter Studies as TopicSARS-CoV-2Ultrasonographycoronavirus disease 2019lung ultrasoundpoint-of-care ultrasoundultrasound imaging

Identifiers

PMID33231895
PMCPMC7753797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.