ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2021
Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder algorithm for MRI brain reconstruction.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bayesian reconstruction of magnetic resonance images using Gaussian processes.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Segmentation Algorithm of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Glioma under Fully Convolutional Densely Connected Convolutional Networks.Stem cells international · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compressed Sensing Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CS-MRI) could be considered a challenged task since it could be designed as an efficient technique for fast MRI acquisition which could be highly beneficial for several clinical routines. In fact, it could grant better scan quality by reducing motion artifacts amount as well as the contrast washout effect. It offers also the possibility to reduce the exploration cost and the patient's anxiety. Recently, Deep Learning Neuronal Network (DL) has been suggested in order to reconstruct MRI scans with conserving the structural details and improving parallel imaging-based fast MRI. In this paper, we propose Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder architecture for CS-MRI reconstruction. Such architecture bridges the gap between the non-learning techniques, using data from only one image, and approaches using large training data. The proposed approach is based on autoencoder architecture divided into two parts: an encoder and a decoder. The encoder as well as the decoder has essentially three convolutional blocks. The proposed architecture has been evaluated through two databases: Hammersmith dataset (for the normal scans) and MICCAI 2018 (for pathological MRI). Moreover, we extend our model to cope with noisy pathological MRI scans. The normalized mean square error (NMSE), the peak-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and the structural similarity index (SSIM) have been adopted as evaluation metrics in order to evaluate the proposed architecture performance and to make a comparative study with the state-of-the-art reconstruction algorithms. The higher PSNR and SSIM values as well as the lowest NMSE values could attest that the proposed architecture offers better reconstruction and preserves textural image details. Furthermore, the running time is about 0.8 s, which is suitable for real-time processing. Such results could encourage the neurologist to adopt it in their clinical routines. Graphical abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33231848What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.