Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33231848›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2021

Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder algorithm for MRI brain reconstruction.

Ines Njeh, Hiba Mzoughi, Mohamed Ben Slima, Ahmed Ben Hamida, Chokri Mhiri, Kheireddine Ben Mahfoudh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ines NjehAdvanced Technology for Medicine & Signals, National School of Engineering of Sfax (ENIS), Sfax University, Sfax, Tunisia. inesnjeh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9538-8404
Hiba MzoughiAdvanced Technology for Medicine & Signals, National School of Engineering of Sfax (ENIS), Sfax University, Sfax, Tunisia.
Mohamed Ben SlimaAdvanced Technology for Medicine & Signals, National School of Engineering of Sfax (ENIS), Sfax University, Sfax, Tunisia.
Ahmed Ben HamidaAdvanced Technology for Medicine & Signals, National School of Engineering of Sfax (ENIS), Sfax University, Sfax, Tunisia.
Chokri MhiriDepartment of Neurology, Habib Bourguiba Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia.
Kheireddine Ben MahfoudhDepartment of Radiology, Habib Bourguiba Hospital, Sfax, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compressed Sensing Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CS-MRI) could be considered a challenged task since it could be designed as an efficient technique for fast MRI acquisition which could be highly beneficial for several clinical routines. In fact, it could grant better scan quality by reducing motion artifacts amount as well as the contrast washout effect. It offers also the possibility to reduce the exploration cost and the patient's anxiety. Recently, Deep Learning Neuronal Network (DL) has been suggested in order to reconstruct MRI scans with conserving the structural details and improving parallel imaging-based fast MRI. In this paper, we propose Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder architecture for CS-MRI reconstruction. Such architecture bridges the gap between the non-learning techniques, using data from only one image, and approaches using large training data. The proposed approach is based on autoencoder architecture divided into two parts: an encoder and a decoder. The encoder as well as the decoder has essentially three convolutional blocks. The proposed architecture has been evaluated through two databases: Hammersmith dataset (for the normal scans) and MICCAI 2018 (for pathological MRI). Moreover, we extend our model to cope with noisy pathological MRI scans. The normalized mean square error (NMSE), the peak-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and the structural similarity index (SSIM) have been adopted as evaluation metrics in order to evaluate the proposed architecture performance and to make a comparative study with the state-of-the-art reconstruction algorithms. The higher PSNR and SSIM values as well as the lowest NMSE values could attest that the proposed architecture offers better reconstruction and preserves textural image details. Furthermore, the running time is about 0.8 s, which is suitable for real-time processing. Such results could encourage the neurologist to adopt it in their clinical routines. Graphical abstract.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsBrainHumansNeural Networks, ComputerCompressed Sensing Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CS-MRI)Convolutional Encoder-Decoder architectureDeep Learning (DL)Fast MRIImage reconstruction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.