Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33231749›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2021

Variation in reversal learning by three generalist mesocarnivores.

Lauren A Stanton, Eli S Bridge, Joost Huizinga, Shylo R Johnson, Julie K Young, Sarah Benson-Amram

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Inhibitory control tests in non-human animals: validity, reliability, and perspectives.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. ScavengingPeerJ · 2022
    Article
  10. Exposure to humans and task difficulty levels affect wild raccoons (Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lauren A StantonDepartment of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA. laurenashleystanton@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8171-4034
Eli S BridgeOklahoma Biological Survey, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3453-2008
Joost HuizingaOpenAI, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0877-3051
Shylo R JohnsonUSDA/APHIS/WS National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1469-0682
Julie K YoungUSDA/APHIS/WS National Wildlife Research Center - Predator Research Facility, Millville, UT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4522-0157
Sarah Benson-AmramDepartment of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0147-7559

Funding

University of Wyoming Berry Ecology Research GrantWyoming Space Grant Consortium NNX10AO95H
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urbanization imposes novel challenges for wildlife, but also provides new opportunities for exploitation. Generalist species are commonly found in urban habitats, but the cognitive mechanisms facilitating their successful behavioral adaptations and exploitations are largely under-investigated. Cognitive flexibility is thought to enable generalists to be more plastic in their behavior, thereby increasing their adaptability to a variety of environments, including urban habitats. Yet direct measures of cognitive flexibility across urban wildlife are lacking. We used a classic reversal-learning paradigm to investigate the cognitive flexibility of three generalist mesocarnivores commonly found in urban habitats: striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis), raccoons (Procyon lotor), and coyotes (Canis latrans). We developed an automated device and testing protocol that allowed us to administer tests of reversal learning in captivity without extensive training or experimenter involvement. Although most subjects were able to rapidly form and reverse learned associations, we found moderate variation in performance and behavior during trials. Most notably, we observed heightened neophobia and a lack of habituation expressed by coyotes. We discuss the implications of such differences among generalists with regard to urban adaptation and we identify goals for future research. This study is an important step in investigating the relationships between cognition, generalism, and urban adaptation.

Indexed as

CoyotesReversal LearningAnimalsAnimals, WildMephitidaeRaccoonsBehavioral adaptationCarnivoreComparative cognitionFlexibilityGeneralismUrbanization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.