Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33231731›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2021

Validity and Utility Testing of a Criteria-led Discharge Checklist to Determine Post-operative Recovery after Abdominal Surgery: an International Multicentre Prospective Cohort Trial.

Ianthe Boden, Calvin Peng, Jane Lockstone, Julie Reeve, Claire Hackett, Lesley Anderson, Cat Hill, Brooke Winzer, Nishanthi Gurusinghe, Linda Denehy

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hemihepatectomy: The ORANGE II PLUS Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Trial
  2. Development of criteria-led discharge for patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ianthe BodenDepartment of Physiotherapy, Launceston General Hospital, Clifford Craig Foundation, TAS, PO BOX 1963, Launceston, 7250, Australia. ianthe.boden@ths.tas.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9283-4779
Calvin PengDepartment of Surgery, Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, TAS, Australia.
Jane LockstoneDepartment of Physiotherapy, Launceston General Hospital, Clifford Craig Foundation, TAS, PO BOX 1963, Launceston, 7250, Australia.
Julie ReeveSchool of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Claire HackettMelbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Lesley AndersonPhysiotherapy Department, North Shore Hospital, Waitemata District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.
Cat HillPhysiotherapy Department, North West Regional Hospital, Burnie, TAS, Australia.
Brooke WinzerPhysiotherapy Department, Northeast Health Wangaratta, Wangaratta, VIC, Australia.
Nishanthi GurusingheDepartment of Surgery, Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, TAS, Australia.
Linda DenehyMelbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AULaunceston General Hospital · AUNorth Shore Hospital · NZNortheast Health · USNorth West Regional Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCriteria-led discharge (CLD) has promising potential to reduce unnecessary hospital stay after abdominal surgery; however, the validity and utility of CLD is uncertain as studies are limited to small single-centre studies involving predominantly elective colorectal surgery.

methodsThis prospective international multicentre cohort study explored the relationship between a CLD checklist, post-operative recovery, and hospital length of stay using patient-level data from four clinical trials involving 1071 adults undergoing all types of emergency and elective abdominal surgery at five hospitals across Australia and New Zealand. Patients were assessed daily for 21 post-operative days using a standardised CLD checklist. Surgeons and hospital clinicians were masked to findings. Criterion, construct, and content validity of the checklist to accurately reflect discharge decisions by surgical teams, assess physiological recovery, and encompass parameters signalling physiological readiness to discharge were tested. Potential utility of CLD to minimise unnecessary hospital stay was assessed by comparing day of readiness to discharge to actual day of discharge.

resultsThe CLD checklist had concordance with existing discharge planning practices and accurately measured a longer post-operative recovery in more complex clinical situations. The CLD checklist in its current format did not detect all legitimate medical and surgical reasons necessitating a continued stay in hospital. Day of readiness to discharge was 0.8 days (95% CI 0.7 to 0.9, p < 0.001) less than actual day of discharge.

conclusionA CLD checklist has excellent criterion and construct validity in measuring physiological recovery following all types of major elective and emergency abdominal surgery. Content validity could be improved. The use of CLD has the potential to reduce unnecessary hospital stay although the safety of discharging patients according to the criteria requires investigation prior to implementation.

trial registrationTrials were prospectively registered at the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (LIPPSMAck POP 12613000664741, ICEAGE 12615000318583, PLASTIC 12619001344189, NIPPER PLUS 12617000269336).

Indexed as

ChecklistPatient DischargeAdultAustraliaCohort StudiesHumansLength of StayNew ZealandPostoperative ComplicationsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33231731
OpenAlexW3107216383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.