ArticleDer Anaesthesist2021
[Emergency medicine in the German Maritime Search and Rescue Service-Evaluation of medical emergencies in the North Sea and Baltic Sea over 2 years].
Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Epidemiology of Maritime Patients Requiring Medical Evacuation: A Literature Review.Cureus · 2023Review
- Medical emergencies at sea: an analysis of ambulance-supported and autonomously performed operations by lifeboat crews.BMC emergency medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe logistic peculiarities of an emergency maritime location and the frequent additional threat of accidental hypothermia mean that the treatment of medical emergencies at sea are particularly demanding. This article describes the characteristics of emergency medical missions of the German Maritime Search and Rescue Service (DGzRS) as the main provider of non-helicopter-based medical maritime rescue on the seas off the coasts of Germany. MATERIAL AND
methodsA retrospective analysis of all missions by the DGzRS in 2017 and 2018 was carried out. The data and times of the missions as well as the severity of the diseases of the patients (graduated using the NACA score) were evaluated and exemplarily compared to those of a medical emergency ambulance service from the City of Lübeck.
resultsIn a total of 182 medical missions 224 patients were treated. The mission units of the DGzRS needed a mean time of 30 ± 21 min up to arrival and 43 ± 30 min for rescue, treatment and transport. In 63 missions the patients were accompanied by an emergency physician, who was brought in from the ground rescue service in 44 missions. Due to the waiting time for boarding of the additional personnel, the departure in 26 missions was delayed by an average of 18 ± 7 min. The average severity of the disease in the maritime rescue was significantly higher than in the emergency medical service of Lübeck but the number of resuscitations and fatalities were comparable.
conclusionAlthough the severity of medical emergencies on the seas off the coasts of Germany was high, the emergency physicians frequently arrived with a considerable delay. There is an urgent need for an effective support of the DGzRS by medical personnel specifically trained for maritime missions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.