Observational studyHerz2021
Clinical significance of glycated hemoglobin in acute coronary syndrome patients from the CCC-ACS project : Findings from a multicenter retrospective observational study.
Observational study in Herz, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02306616 (Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China: A Collaborative Project of AHA and CSC (CCC Project) - Acute Coronary Syndrome
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBlood glucose levels are associated with the prognosis of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reflects the average blood glucose level. The purpose of the study was to evaluate HbA1c as a prognostic indicator for ACS.
methodsIn total, 27,337 ACS patients from the CCC-ACS (Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China - Acute Coronary Syndrome) project were enrolled in this study and divided into three groups according to HbA1c level: Group I, HbA1c level <5.7%; Group II, HbA1c level 5.7-6.4%; Group III, HbA1c level ≥6.5%. The primary outcome was an in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), such as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, acute or subacute stent thrombosis, heart failure, cardiogenic shock, or cardiac arrest. Baseline data and effectiveness outcome were compared among patients in the three groups.
resultsGroup III had the highest MACE incidence (13.4% [Group III] vs. 8.7% [Group I] and 10.5% [Group II], p < 0.001). In the logistic regression, there was a statistically significant difference in HbA1c level between the groups (odds ratio [OR]: 1.110, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.008-1.133, p < 0.001). In the receiver operating characteristic curve, the area under the curve for MACE was 0.560 (95% CI: 0.550-0.571, p < 0.001); the cut-off value for the HbA1c level was 6.38%.
conclusionThe HbA1c level was associated with the risk of MACEs in ACS patients with or without diabetes. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02306616. Registered 3 December 2014-Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02306616 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
33231709What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.