Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33231515›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2021

Complications and survival after subcutaneous ureteral bypass device placement in 24 cats: a retrospective study (2016-2019).

Emily Vrijsen, Nausikaa Devriendt, Femke Mortier, Emmelie Stock, Bart Van Goethem, Hilde de Rooster

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Medical management of ureteral stricture-induced hydronephrosis in a cat.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emily VrijsenSmall Animal Department, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3405-1562
Nausikaa DevriendtSmall Animal Department, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Femke MortierSmall Animal Department, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Emmelie StockDepartment of Medical Imaging of Domestic Animals and Orthopaedics of Small Animals, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Bart Van GoethemSmall Animal Department, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Hilde de RoosterSmall Animal Department, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Ghent University · BEUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to document survival, complications and risk factors for the development of complications and mortality prior to discharge after placement of a subcutaneous ureteral bypass (SUB) device in cats.

methodsThe medical records of cats with SUB placement between January 2016 and August 2019 were retrospectively analysed. The development of complications (overall, intraoperative, perioperative, short- and long-term complications) and risk factors for mortality prior to discharge were statistically assessed with univariate binary logistic regression. All variables with a

resultsTwenty-four cats were included; 12 (50.0%) received a unilateral SUB, 11 (45.8%) a bilateral nephrostomy tube with single cystostomy catheter and the remaining cat (4.2%) two unilateral SUBs. Nearly 80% of the cats developed complications, ranging from mild to fatal, including (partial) SUB obstruction (33.3% of complications), lower urinary tract infection (20.8%), pyelonephritis (20.8%) and sterile cystitis (12.5%). Five cats (20.8%) died prior to discharge. Six cats (25.0%) underwent revision surgery. The overall median survival time (MST) was 274 days (range 1-311 days). Complications were most common in the long-term period (14/16 cats), followed by the short-term (9/18 cats), perioperative (10/23 cats) and intraoperative (4/24 cats) periods. Older cats had an increased risk for developing perioperative complications ( CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although complications similar to those previously described were observed, the complication rate was higher and the MST shorter than previously reported in cats undergoing SUB placement. Despite good short-term survival, the development of complications may necessitate regular and intensive control visits. Owners that consider SUB placement should be informed that follow-up can be strenuous and expensive.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesUreterUreteral ObstructionUrinary Tract InfectionsAnimalsCatsRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorscomplicationsrisk factorssubcutaneous ureteral bypasssurvivalUreteral obstruction

Identifiers

PMID33231515
PMCPMC10812192
OpenAlexW3107451121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.