ArticleLupus2021
A prospective study of reproductive factors in relation to risk of systemic lupus erythematosus among black women.
Article in Lupus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endometriosis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2023Pooled it
- Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus: Review and Considerations for Older Populations.Drugs & aging · 2024Review
- The Comorbidity of Endometriosis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) occurs most commonly among reproductive age women, compatible with a potential role of reproductive factors, although past studies including women of mainly European ancestry have yielded conflicting results. We assessed relationships of reproductive factors to SLE risk among black women.
methodsWe followed 58,243 participants in the Black Women's Health Study (BWHS) from 1995 - 2015 using biennial health questionnaires, on which participants reported reproductive and other factors. Self-reported incident SLE cases were confirmed as meeting 1997 American College of Rheumatology SLE classification criteria by medical record review. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for SLE for several reproductive factors, controlling for potential confounders.
resultsDuring 954,476 person-years of follow-up, 125 incident cases of SLE were confirmed. Later age at menarche and longer duration of breast feeding were associated with increased risk of SLE. The multivariable HRs were 2.31 (95% CI, 1.30-4.11) for age at menarche ≥15 relative to age 12, and 1.73 (95% CI, 1.01-2.94) for breast feeding ≥6 months relative to none. There were no clear associations with parity, age at first birth, menopausal status, hysterectomy, age at menopause, or history of endometriosis.
conclusionOur results suggest that later menarchal age and breastfeeding of infants for ≥6 months vs. none may be associated with increased SLE risk among black women, while other reproductive factors did not appear related. The biological mechanisms underlying these potential associations should be pursued.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.