Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33231343›Full record

ArticleChembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology2021

How To Quantify a Genetic Firewall? A Polarity-Based Metric for Genetic Code Engineering.

Markus Schmidt, Vladimir Kubyshkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The promise and peril of mirror bacteria.Acta biochimica Polonica · 2026
    Article
  2. Microbial engineering for sustainable microplastic biodegradation: from enzyme redesign to synthetic consortia.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. How To Quantify a Genetic Firewall? A Polarity-Based Metric for Genetic Code Engineering.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Markus SchmidtBiofaction KG Kundmanngasse 39/12, 1030, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9788-4791
Vladimir KubyshkinDepartment of Chemistry, University of Manitoba, Dysart Road 144, Winnipeg, R3T 2N2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4467-4205

Funding

BioRoboost 820699European Commission's Horizon 2020 766975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic code engineering aims to produce organisms that translate genetic information in a different way from that prescribed by the standard genetic code. This endeavor could eventually lead to genetic isolation, where an organism that operates under a different genetic code will not be able to transfer functional genes with other living species, thereby standing behind a genetic firewall. It is not clear however, how distinct the code should be, or how to measure the distance. We have developed a metric (Δ

Indexed as

Genetic EngineeringAlgorithmsAmino AcidsCodonGenetic CodeModels, GeneticAmino AcidsCodonamino acidsbiosafetygenetic code engineeringgenetic firewallxenobiology

Identifiers

PMID33231343
PMCPMC8049029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.