ReviewTissue engineering. Part A2020
Extracellular Matrix for Small-Diameter Vascular Grafts.
Review in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanofiber-reinforced ECM-based bioink for hybrid biofabrication of adventitia-mimetic anisotropic vascular constructs.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Article
- Nanomaterials for small diameter vascular grafts: overview and outlook.Nanoscale advances · 2023Review
- Article
- Strategies to counteract adverse remodeling of vascular graft: A 3D view of current graft innovations.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To treat coronary heart disease, coronary artery bypass grafts are used to divert blood flow around blockages in the coronary arteries. Autologous grafts are the gold standard of care, but they are characterized by their lack of availability, low quality, and high failure rates. Alternatively, tissue-engineered small-diameter vascular grafts made from synthetic or natural polymers have not demonstrated adequate results to replace autologous grafts; synthetic grafts result in a loss of patency due to thrombosis and intimal hyperplasia, whereas scaffolds from natural polymers are generally unable to support the physiological conditions. Extracellular matrix (ECM) from a variety of sources, including cell-derived, 2D, and cannular tissues, has become an increasingly useful tool for this application. The current review examines the ECM-based methods that have recently been investigated in the field and comments on their viability for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.