Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33230981›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2021

How to assess visual function in acquired brain injury-Asking is not enough.

Märta Berthold-Lindstedt, Jan Johansson, Jan Ygge, Kristian Borg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Märta Berthold-LindstedtDivision of Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Clinical Science, Karolinska Institute, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9717-1820
Jan JohanssonEye and Vision, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jan YggeEye and Vision, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kristian BorgDivision of Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Clinical Science, Karolinska Institute, Danderyd University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcquired brain injury affects many brain areas and causes a range of dysfunctions including vision-related issues. These issues can have negative impacts on rehabilitation progress and activities of daily life but may easily be overlooked. There is no common recommendation about how to assess visual impairments after ABI. The purpose of this study was to estimate the frequency of objectively measures oculomotor dysfunctions, and also how these findings are related to two inventories intended to support detection of visual impairment.

methodsThe study was cross-sectional and included 73 outpatients. In addition to the standard evaluation program, the patients went through a comprehensive optometric examination. The inventories used were the Vision Interview (VI) and the Convergence Insufficiency Symptom Survey (CISS).

resultsAll three types of examinations showed a high proportion vision-related symptoms. Fusion vergence was the most common objectively measured finding, 83%. There were seven statistically significant associations between five VI items and five visual deficits. The strength of associations was moderate (Phi 0.261-0.487, p < .05). The sensitivity and specificity of the CISS were moderate.

conclusionWe found high percentages of the patients with visual symptoms and dysfunctions. Due to the complexity of visual symptoms and functional deficits in ABI, we find it necessary to combine both symptom assessment and vision examination in order to capture visual function issues.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesOcular Motility DisordersCross-Sectional StudiesEye MovementsHumansSurveys and Questionnairesbrain injuriesocular motility disordersstroketraumatic brain injuryvision disorders

Identifiers

PMID33230981
PMCPMC7882154
OpenAlexW3106916287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.