ArticlePhysiological reports2020
Novel perspective on contractile properties and intensity-dependent verification of force-frequency relationship during neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
Article in Physiological reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute effects of caffeine or quercetin ingestion on motor unit firing pattern before and after resistance exercise.European journal of applied physiology · 2024Trial
- Subtetanic neuromuscular electrical stimulation can maintain Wingate test performance but augment blood lactate accumulation.European journal of applied physiology · 2024Article
- The dose-response relationship of quercetin on the motor unit firing patterns and contractile properties of muscle in men and women.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2023Article
- Novel perspective on contractile properties and intensity-dependent verification of force-frequency relationship during neuromuscular electrical stimulation.Physiological reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aims of the present study were: (a) to examine the effect of the stimulus intensity on force-frequency and torque fluctuation-frequency relationships during Neuromuscular electrical stimulation; and (b) to identify a novel parameter that can be used to evaluate muscle contractile properties.
methodsElectrically elicited joint torque involving the quadriceps femoris muscle was recorded during neuromuscular electrical stimulation at two different stimulus intensities in 19 healthy men. Stimulation frequencies were set at 5-40 Hz with a duration of 10 s. Evoked joint torque was compared among all stimulation frequencies between the two stimulus intensities (68 and 113 V). The torque fluctuation at each stimulation frequency as the change in the contraction pattern was also compared between the intensities. Torque and torque fluctuation were normalized at each frequency by the largest torque or torque fluctuation, respectively. We extracted a novel parameter: the arrival point of tetanic contraction based on force-frequency and torque fluctuation-frequency curves.
resultsThere were significant differences in normalized torque at 5-25 and 40 Hz and in normalized torque fluctuation at 15-30 and 40 Hz between the two stimulus intensities. Extracted parameters showed no significant difference between the intensities.
conclusionThe results suggest that force-frequency relationships during neuromuscular electrical stimulation are influenced by the intensity of stimulation applied to the quadriceps femoris muscle. However, we consider that it is possible to simultaneously evaluate contractile properties using the novel parameter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.