Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33230875›Full record

ReviewAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.)2021

A Review of Piezoelectric and Magnetostrictive Biosensor Materials for Detection of COVID-19 and Other Viruses.

Fumio Narita, Zhenjin Wang, Hiroki Kurita, Zhen Li, Yu Shi, Yu Jia, Constantinos Soutis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Topology in Biological Piezoelectric Materials.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Biosensors for the detection of flaviviruses: A review.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  15. Aptameric Metal-Organic Framework Nanobiosensor.ACS applied nano materials · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fumio NaritaDepartment of Frontier Sciences for Advanced Environment, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Tohoku University, Aoba-yama 6-6-02, Sendai, 980-8579, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0957-1948
Zhenjin WangDepartment of Materials Processing, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Aoba-yama 6-6-02, Sendai, 980-8579, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2546-6029
Hiroki KuritaDepartment of Frontier Sciences for Advanced Environment, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Tohoku University, Aoba-yama 6-6-02, Sendai, 980-8579, Japan.
Zhen LiCollege of Automation Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 29 Jiangjun Avenue, Nanjing, 211106, China.
Yu ShiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Chester, Thornton Science Park, Pool Lane, Chester, CH2 4NU, UK.
Yu JiaSchool of Engineering and Applied Science, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK.
Constantinos SoutisAerospace Research Institute, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

Funding

Core-to-Core Program JPJSCCA20200005Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus has changed the lives of people around the world with a huge impact on economies and societies. The development of wearable sensors that can continuously monitor the environment for viruses may become an important research area. Here, the state of the art of research on biosensor materials for virus detection is reviewed. A general description of the principles for virus detection is included, along with a critique of the experimental work dedicated to various virus sensors, and a summary of their detection limitations. The piezoelectric sensors used for the detection of human papilloma, vaccinia, dengue, Ebola, influenza A, human immunodeficiency, and hepatitis B viruses are examined in the first section; then the second part deals with magnetostrictive sensors for the detection of bacterial spores, proteins, and classical swine fever. In addition, progress related to early detection of COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) is discussed in the final section, where remaining challenges in the field are also identified. It is believed that this review will guide material researchers in their future work of developing smart biosensors, which can further improve detection sensitivity in monitoring currently known and future virus threats.

Indexed as

MagneticsAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceBiosensing TechniquesCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingElectric ConductivityHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHepatitis BHIV InfectionsHumansInfluenza, HumanPapillomavirus InfectionsSevere DengueVacciniaartificial intelligencebiosensorsdata analyticsdetection propertieselectromagneto-mechanical designInternet of Thingsmachine learningpiezoelectric/magnetostrictive materialsvirus

Identifiers

PMID33230875
PMCPMC7744850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.