Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33230815›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2021

Access to Health Services in Older Minority Ethnic Groups with Dementia: A Systematic Review.

Melissa Co, Elyse Couch, Qian Gao, Scarlett Mac-Ginty, Jayati Das-Munshi, Matthew Prina

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mapping racial and ethnic healthcare disparities for persons living with dementia: A scoping review.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melissa CoDepartment of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7789-0871
Elyse CouchDepartment of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Qian GaoDepartment of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Scarlett Mac-GintyDepartment of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Jayati Das-MunshiDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Matthew PrinaDepartment of Health Service and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GB

Funding

A COMPREHENSIVE CONSIDERATION OF SOURCE MEMORYF32MH012567 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MARSH, ELIZABETH J · 2000 to 2002
$110k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesWhile it is acknowledged that minority ethnic (ME) groups across international settings face barriers to accessing care for dementia, it is not clear whether ME groups access services less frequently as a result. The objective of this review is to examine whether ME groups have longer delays before accessing dementia/memory services, higher use of acute care and crisis services and lower use of routine care services based on existing literature. We also examined whether ME groups had higher dementia severity or lower cognition when presenting to memory services.

designSystematic review with narrative synthesis.

settingNonresidential medical, psychiatric, memory, and emergency services.

participantsTwenty studies totaling 94,431 older adults with dementia or mild cognitive impairment. MEASUREMENTS: We searched Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Global Health, and PsycINFO from inception to November 2018 for peer-reviewed observational studies which quantified ethnic minority differences in nonresidential health service use in people with dementia. Narrative synthesis was used to analyze findings.

resultsTwenty studies were included, mostly from the U.S. (n = 13), as well as the UK (n = 4), Australia (n = 1), Belgium (n = 1), and the Netherlands (n = 1). There was little evidence that ME groups in any country accessed routine care at different rates than comparison groups, although studies may have been underpowered. There was strong evidence that African American/Black groups had higher use of hospital inpatient services versus U.S. comparison groups. Primary care and emergency services were less well studied. Study quality was mixed, and there was a large amount of variability in the way ethnicity and service use outcomes were ascertained and defined.

conclusionThere is evidence that some ME groups, such as Black/African American groups in the U.S., may use more acute care services than comparison populations, but less evidence for differences in routine care use. Research is sparse, especially outside the U.S.

Indexed as

AgedCognitive DysfunctionDementiaEthnicityHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMinority GroupsQualitative Researchdementiahospitalmemory servicesrace/ethnicityservice use

Identifiers

PMID33230815
PMCPMC7984264
OpenAlexW3106185844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.