SynthesisDrugs & aging2021
Treatment of Bullous Pemphigoid in People Aged 80 Years and Older: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Synthesis in Drugs & aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of Bullous Pemphigoid and Norwegian Scabies with Dupilumab Plus Ivermectin.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2026Article
- Severe Bullous Pemphigoid Onset after Jugular Catheter Placement in a Patient on Hemodialysis.Case reports in nephrology and dialysisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBullous pemphigoid commonly affects older adults and has a detrimental effect on both quality of life and longevity. Systemic corticosteroids, the mainstay of therapy, may cause significant adverse effects, especially in older patients. Therefore, safer therapeutic options are being sought.
objectiveThe objective of this article was to systematically review the published evidence on the efficacy and safety of different treatment modalities for bullous pemphigoid in older patients.
methodsWe performed a systematic review of all publications until May 2020 in PubMed, Google Scholar, and the ongoing trials registry of the US National Institutes of Health databases evaluating the efficacy and safety of bullous pemphigoid treatments in patients aged older than 80 years. The primary outcome was complete response. The secondary outcomes were partial response, complete remission on minimal therapy or during tapering, recurrence, adverse events, and mortality.
resultsTwenty-eight publications were included: 2 randomized controlled trials, 5 prospective cohort studies, 10 retrospective cohort studies, and 11 case series, with a total of 153 older patients. The overall complete response rate was 31%. Topical corticosteroids had the highest complete response rate (55%) with a low side-effect profile. Biologics (omalizumab and rituximab) were effective in achieving complete remission on minimal therapy (29%) without recurrence, although rituximab was associated with a relatively high mortality rate (29%).
conclusionsCurrent data suggest that topical corticosteroids are effective and safe and should remain the first line of treatment for bullous pemphigoid in older adults. However, their application is difficult and requires a high-functioning patient, third-party assistance, or a relatively mild disease. Biological agents are effective but warrant meticulous patient selection owing to the relatively high mortality rate associated with rituximab. CLINICAL
trial registrationPROSPERO registration number CRD42020186686.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.