Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33230742›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2021

Non-equilibrium approach for binding free energies in cyclodextrins in SAMPL7: force fields and software.

Yuriy Khalak, Gary Tresadern, Bert L de Groot, Vytautas Gapsys

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Ligand-Binding Free Energy Simulations of Membrane Proteins.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Host Dynamics under General-Purpose Force Fields.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. An overview of the SAMPL8 host-guest binding challenge.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Assigning confidence to molecular property prediction.Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2021
    Article
  13. Evaluation of log P, pKJournal of computer-aided molecular design · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. SAMPL7 blind predictions using nonequilibrium alchemical approaches.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuriy KhalakComputational Biomolecular Dynamics Group, Department of Theoretical and Computational Biophysics, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0580-0766
Gary TresadernComputational Chemistry, Janssen Research & Development, Janssen Pharmaceutica N. V., Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340, Beerse, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4801-1644
Bert L de GrootComputational Biomolecular Dynamics Group, Department of Theoretical and Computational Biophysics, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3570-3534
Vytautas GapsysComputational Biomolecular Dynamics Group, Department of Theoretical and Computational Biophysics, Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, 37077, Göttingen, Germany. vgapsys@gwdg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-6761-7780

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the current work we report on our participation in the SAMPL7 challenge calculating absolute free energies of the host-guest systems, where 2 guest molecules were probed against 9 hosts-cyclodextrin and its derivatives. Our submission was based on the non-equilibrium free energy calculation protocol utilizing an averaged consensus result from two force fields (GAFF and CGenFF). The submitted prediction achieved accuracy of [Formula: see text] in terms of the unsigned error averaged over the whole dataset. Subsequently, we further report on the underlying reasons for discrepancies between our calculations and another submission to the SAMPL7 challenge which employed a similar methodology, but disparate ligand and water force fields. As a result we have uncovered a number of issues in the dihedral parameter definition of the GAFF 2 force field. In addition, we identified particular cases in the molecular topologies where different software packages had a different interpretation of the same force field. This latter observation might be of particular relevance for systematic comparisons of molecular simulation software packages. The aforementioned factors have an influence on the final free energy estimates and need to be considered when performing alchemical calculations.

Indexed as

SoftwareCyclodextrinsEntropyHumansLigandsMolecular Dynamics SimulationMolecular StructureProtein BindingProteinsSolventsThermodynamicsCyclodextrinsLigandsProteinsSolventsAlchemyForce fieldNon-equilibrium free energy calculations

Identifiers

PMID33230742
PMCPMC7862541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.