Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33230719›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2021

Could a careful clinical examination distinguish physiologic phimosis from balanitis xerotica obliterans in children?

Filippo Ghidini, Calogero Virgone, Rebecca Pulvirenti, Emanuele Trovalusci, Piergiorgio Gamba

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Filippo GhidiniPediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Padua General Hospital, Padua University, via Nicolò Giustiniani, 35121, Padua, Italy.
Calogero VirgonePediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Padua General Hospital, Padua University, via Nicolò Giustiniani, 35121, Padua, Italy. calogero.virgone@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3651-9416
Rebecca PulvirentiPediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Padua General Hospital, Padua University, via Nicolò Giustiniani, 35121, Padua, Italy.
Emanuele TrovalusciPediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Padua General Hospital, Padua University, via Nicolò Giustiniani, 35121, Padua, Italy.
Piergiorgio GambaPediatric Surgery Unit, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Padua General Hospital, Padua University, via Nicolò Giustiniani, 35121, Padua, Italy.
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of balanitis xerotica obliterans (BXO) in children may be challenging, since clinical examination only could lead to an underestimation of its incidence. The aim of this retrospective and single-centre study is to assess the diagnostic performance of clinical examination, together with clinical history, in identifying BXO. Ninety-seven children underwent circumcision for phimosis from 2015 to 2019. Histology was routinely performed. Cohen's kappa coefficient, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios and accuracy of macroscopic appearance of the foreskin, steroid administration and past medical history were estimated. Forty-eight patients (50%) were affected by BXO; 31 of them (69%) presented with suggestive clinical signs. A strictured or whitish urethral meatus was detected during surgery in nine cases (19%); this was associated to allergic or immune diseases (p = 0.046). Foreskin appearance alone mildly correlated with histology (k = 0.494; p < 0.001) and it showed a diagnostic accuracy of 75%. The specificity and positive predictive value of abnormal macroscopic findings at examination, together with a positive clinical history for other allergic or immune diseases, and/or for balanitis, were 100% and the positive likelihood ratio was greater than 10. Conversely, sensitivity decreased to 4.5% (95% CI 0-11%).Conclusion: Foreskin appearance together with clinical history could predict BXO with certainty. However, since the absence of a positive medical history could not exclude the diagnosis, foreskin histology is still highly recommended. What is Known: • Occurrence of balanitis xerotica obliterans may be underestimated in children and it could lead to long-term complications. • The diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination is controversial. What is New: • Clinical signs together with patients' medical history present high specificity and positive predictive values but low sensitivity. • When suggestive clinical aspects are present, patient should be referred to surgery avoiding prolonged conservative treatment; and preputial histology is highly recommended.

Indexed as

Balanitis Xerotica ObliteransLichen Sclerosus et AtrophicusPhimosisChildForeskinHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesBalanitis xerotica obliteransChildrenLichen sclerosusPhimosisPreputial histology

Identifiers

PMID33230719
PMCPMC7813725
OpenAlexW3109622903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.