Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33230568›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2021

Radiation oncology as part of medical education-current status and possible digital future prospects.

Hendrik Dapper, Marjo Wijnen-Meijer, Salome Rathfelder, Katharina Mosene, Isabelle von Kirchbauer, Denise Bernhardt, Pascal O Berberat, Stephanie E Combs

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mobile applications in radiation oncology-current choices and future potentials.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Digital transfer in radiation oncology education for medical students-single-center data and systemic review of the literature.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the Current Use of Educational Technologies in the Oncology Domain Across Europe: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  5. Shaping the future of radiation oncology education: results of a nationwide student survey from Germany.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  6. Impact of Competency-Based Education and Multidisciplinary Team Teaching for Standardized Training Resident on Radiation Oncology.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Digital redesign of the radiotherapy course for medical students with a blended learning approach.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Successful implementation of online educational lectures of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO).Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2024
    Article
  15. Principles of oncology taught in a one-week course.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  16. Impact of Practical Online Lessons on Chinese Medical Students' Perception of Radiation Oncology.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Teaching communication skills in medical education : Best practice example of an interdisciplinary seminar in radiation oncology.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Article
  19. Teaching in radiation oncology: now and 2025-results of a focus group with medical students.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Article
  20. Development, implementation, and results of a simulation-based hands-on brachytherapy workshop for medical students.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hendrik DapperDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. hendrik.dapper@mri.tum.de.
Marjo Wijnen-MeijerSchool of Medicine, TUM Medical Education Center, Technical University Munich, Nigerstraße 3, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Salome RathfelderDRF Stiftung Luftrettung gAG, Rita-Maiburg-Straße 2, 70794, Filderstadt, Germany.
Katharina MoseneSchool of Medicine, TUM Medical Education Center, Technical University Munich, Nigerstraße 3, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Isabelle von KirchbauerSchool of Medicine, TUM Medical Education Center, Technical University Munich, Nigerstraße 3, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Denise BernhardtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Pascal O BerberatSchool of Medicine, TUM Medical Education Center, Technical University Munich, Nigerstraße 3, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Stephanie E CombsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DEDeutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEducation as part of medical education is currently changing rapidly. Not least because of the corona crisis, more and more digital teaching formats and innovative teaching concepts such as the flipped classroom model are finding their way into teaching. We analyzed the acceptance and effectiveness of traditional teaching methods as well as the interest in innovative e‑learning methods among medical students in the field of radiation oncology at the medical school of the Technical University of Munich.

methodsWe carried out an online-based survey as well as a knowledge test on all students from two terms who had completed the seminar series of radiation oncology. The survey comprised seven questions on the frequency of participation, acceptance, and judgment of the effectiveness in terms of learning and on a potential use of e‑learning methods using a six-point Likert scale. The test consisted of 10 multiple-choice questions.

resultsTraditional teaching methods are largely accepted by students and most students consider the current learning format to be effective in terms of the teaching effect in the field of radiation oncology. However, only about 50% of all knowledge questions were answered correctly. The possible use of e‑learning methods was judged critically or desired in roughly equal parts among the students.

conclusionTraditional seminars enjoy a high level of acceptance among students. Effectiveness with regard to the internalization of content taught, however, should be increased. After all, the future seems to lie in the integration of e‑learning in the form of educational videos and practical seminars.

Indexed as

Education, DistanceAudiovisual AidsConsumer BehaviorCurriculumForecastingGermanyHumansProgram EvaluationRadiation OncologySchools, MedicalStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesTeachingEducationE‑learningFlipped classroomRadiation oncologySeminars

Identifiers

PMID33230568
PMCPMC7682521
OpenAlexW3107942333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.