Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33230532›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2021

Machine phenotyping of cluster headache and its response to verapamil.

Amy R Tso, Mikael Brudfors, Daisuke Danno, Lou Grangeon, Sanjay Cheema, Manjit Matharu, Parashkev Nachev

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Headache Field.Current pain and headache reports · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Examining patient benefit.Future healthcare journal · 2023
    Article
  14. Pharmacogenetics in Primary Headache Disorders.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amy R TsoHigh-Dimensional Neurology Group, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Mikael BrudforsWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK.
Daisuke DannoHeadache and Facial Pain Group, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Lou GrangeonHeadache and Facial Pain Group, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Sanjay CheemaHeadache and Facial Pain Group, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Manjit MatharuHeadache and Facial Pain Group, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Parashkev NachevHigh-Dimensional Neurology Group, University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 213038/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cluster headache is characterized by recurrent, unilateral attacks of excruciating pain associated with ipsilateral cranial autonomic symptoms. Although a wide array of clinical, anatomical, physiological, and genetic data have informed multiple theories about the underlying pathophysiology, the lack of a comprehensive mechanistic understanding has inhibited, on the one hand, the development of new treatments and, on the other, the identification of features predictive of response to established ones. The first-line drug, verapamil, is found to be effective in only half of all patients, and after several weeks of dose escalation, rendering therapeutic selection both uncertain and slow. Here we use high-dimensional modelling of routinely acquired phenotypic and MRI data to quantify the predictability of verapamil responsiveness and to illuminate its neural dependants, across a cohort of 708 patients evaluated for cluster headache at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery between 2007 and 2017. We derive a succinct latent representation of cluster headache from non-linear dimensionality reduction of structured clinical features, revealing novel phenotypic clusters. In a subset of patients, we show that individually predictive models based on gradient boosting machines can predict verapamil responsiveness from clinical (410 patients) and imaging (194 patients) features. Models combining clinical and imaging data establish the first benchmark for predicting verapamil responsiveness, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.689 on cross-validation (95% confidence interval: 0.651 to 0.710) and 0.621 on held-out data. In the imaged patients, voxel-based morphometry revealed a grey matter cluster in lobule VI of the cerebellum (-4, -66, -20) exhibiting enhanced grey matter concentrations in verapamil non-responders compared with responders (familywise error-corrected P = 0.008, 29 voxels). We propose a mechanism for the therapeutic effect of verapamil that draws on the neuroanatomy and neurochemistry of the identified region. Our results reveal previously unrecognized high-dimensional structure within the phenotypic landscape of cluster headache that enables prediction of treatment response with modest fidelity. An analogous approach applied to larger, globally representative datasets could facilitate data-driven redefinition of diagnostic criteria and stronger, more generalizable predictive models of treatment responsiveness.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrainCluster HeadacheFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypeROC CurveTreatment OutcomeVerapamilYoung AdultVerapamilbrain imagingcerebellumcluster headacherepresentation learningtreatment outcome prediction

Identifiers

PMID33230532
PMCPMC7940170
OpenAlexW3107846675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.