Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33230504›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Microbe2020

Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Hong Kong and in residents evacuated from Hubei province, China: a multicohort study.

Kelvin Kai-Wang To, Vincent Chi-Chung Cheng, Jian-Piao Cai, Kwok-Hung Chan, Lin-Lei Chen, Lok-Hin Wong, Charlotte Yee-Ki Choi, Carol Ho-Yan Fong, Anthony Chin-Ki Ng, Lu Lu and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Microbe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Kelvin Kai-Wang ToState Key Laboratory for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Pokfulam, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Vincent Chi-Chung ChengDepartment of Microbiology, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Jian-Piao CaiDepartment of Microbiology, Carol Yu Centre for Infection, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Pokfulam, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Kwok-Hung ChanState Key Laboratory for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Pokfulam, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Lin-Lei ChenDepartment of Microbiology, Carol Yu Centre for Infection, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Pokfulam, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Lok-Hin WongDepartment of Microbiology, Carol Yu Centre for Infection, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Pokfulam, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Charlotte Yee-Ki ChoiDepartment of Microbiology, Carol Yu Centre for Infection, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Pokfulam, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Carol Ho-Yan FongDepartment of Microbiology, Carol Yu Centre for Infection, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Pokfulam, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Anthony Chin-Ki NgDepartment of Microbiology, Carol Yu Centre for Infection, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Pokfulam, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Lu LuDepartment of Microbiology, Carol Yu Centre for Infection, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Pokfulam, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Cui-Ting LuoDepartment of Microbiology, Carol Yu Centre for Infection, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Pokfulam, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Jianwen SituDepartment of Microbiology, Carol Yu Centre for Infection, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Pokfulam, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Tom Wai-Hin ChungDepartment of Microbiology, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Shuk-Ching WongInfection Control Team, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong West Cluster, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Grace See-Wai KwanDepartment of Microbiology, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Siddharth SridharState Key Laboratory for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Pokfulam, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Jasper Fuk-Woo ChanState Key Laboratory for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Pokfulam, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Cecilia Yuen-Man FanProfessional Development and Quality Assurance Service, Department of Health, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Vivien W M ChuangQuality & Safety Division (Infection, Emergency, and Contingency), Hospital Authority, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Kin-Hang KokState Key Laboratory for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Pokfulam, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Ivan Fan-Ngai HungDepartment of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Pokfulam, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Kwok-Yung YuenState Key Laboratory for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Pokfulam, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of subclinical severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections in perpetuating the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown because population seroprevalence data are absent. We aimed to establish the sensitivity and specificity of our enzyme immunoassay and microneutralisation assay, and the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Hong Kong before and after the pandemic, as well as in Hong Kong residents evacuated from Hubei province, China.

methodsWe did a multicohort study in a hospital and university in Hong Kong. We evaluated the sensitivity of our enzyme immunoassay and microneutralisation assay with RT-PCR data from patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 and the specificity of our enzyme immunoassay and microneutralisation assay with archived serum samples collected before 2019. We compared the seropositivity of the general population of Hong Kong before and after the pandemic had begun, and determined the seropositivity of Hong Kong residents evacuated from Hubei province, China, in March, 2020.

findingsBetween Feb 26 and March 18, 2020, we assessed RT-PCR samples from 45 patients who had recovered from COVID-19 to establish the sensitivity of our enzyme immunoassay and microneutralisation assay. To establish the specificity of these assays, we retrieved archived serum. The sensitivity was 91·1% (41 of 45 [95% CI 78·8-97·5]) for the microneutralisation assay, 57·8% (26 of 45 [42·2-72·3]) for anti-nucleoprotein IgG, 66·7% (30 of 45 [51·1-80·0]) for anti-spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG, and 73·3% (33 of 45 [58·1-85·4]) for enzyme immunoassay (either positive for anti-nucleoprotein or anti-RBD IgG). The specificity was 100% (152 of 152 [95% CI 97·6-100·0]) for both the enzyme immunoassay and microneutralisation assay. Among the Hong Kong general population, 53 (2·7%) of 1938 were enzyme immunoassay positive, but of those who were positive, all 53 were microneutralisation negative, and no significant increase was seen in the seroprevalence between April 12, 2018, and Feb 13, 2020. Among asymptomatic Hubei returnees, 17 (4%) of 452 were seropositive with the enzyme immunoassay or the microneutralisation assay, with 15 (88%) of 17 seropositive with the microneutralisation assay, and two familial clusters were identified.

interpretationOur serological data suggest that SARS-CoV-2 is a new emerging virus. The seropositivity rate in Hubei returnees indicates that RT-PCR-confirmed patients only represent a small proportion of the total number of cases. The low seroprevalence suggests that most of the Hong Kong and Hubei population remain susceptible to COVID-19. Future waves of the outbreak are inevitable without a vaccine or antiviral prophylaxis. The role of age-related cross reactive non-neutralising antibodies in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 warrants further investigation.

fundingRichard and Carol Yu, May Tam Mak Mei Yin, Shaw Foundation (Hong Kong), Michael Tong, Marina Lee, and the Government Consultancy Service (see acknowledgments for full list).

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralChinaHong KongHumansImmunoglobulin GPandemicsSeroepidemiologic StudiesAntibodies, ViralImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID33230504
PMCPMC7673299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.