Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33230388›Full record

ArticleEnvironment, development and sustainability2021

Lessons learned and questions raised during and post-COVID-19 anthropopause period in relation to the environment and climate.

Christos S Zerefos, Stavros Solomos, John Kapsomenakis, Anastasia Poupkou, Lida Dimitriadou, Iliana D Polychroni, Pavlos Kalabokas, Constandinos M Philandras, Dimitris Thanos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environment, development and sustainability, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Climate Changes and COVID-19.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  3. Interactions between climate and COVID-19.The Lancet. Planetary health · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christos S ZerefosResearch Centre for Atmospheric Physics and Climatology, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-4795-523X
Stavros SolomosResearch Centre for Atmospheric Physics and Climatology, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece.
John KapsomenakisResearch Centre for Atmospheric Physics and Climatology, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Anastasia PoupkouResearch Centre for Atmospheric Physics and Climatology, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Lida DimitriadouResearch Centre for Atmospheric Physics and Climatology, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Iliana D PolychroniResearch Centre for Atmospheric Physics and Climatology, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Pavlos KalabokasResearch Centre for Atmospheric Physics and Climatology, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Constandinos M PhilandrasResearch Centre for Atmospheric Physics and Climatology, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Dimitris ThanosBiomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the first part, this work reports that during the global "anthropopause" period, that was imposed in March and April 2020 for limiting the spread of COVID-19, the concentrations of basic air pollutants over Europe were reduced by up to 70%. During May and June, the gradual lift of the stringent measures resulted in the recovery of these reductions with pollution concentrations approaching the levels before the lockdown by the end of June 2020. In the second part, this work examines the alleged correlations between the reported cases of COVID-19 and temperature, humidity and particulate matter for March and April 2020 in Europe. It was found that decreasing temperatures and relative humidity with increasing concentrations of particulate matter are correlated with an increase in the number of reported cases during these 2 months. However, when these calculations were repeated for May and June, we found a remarkable drop in the significance of the correlations which leads us to question the generally accepted inverse relation between pandemics and air temperature at least during the warmer months. Such a relationship could not be supported in our study for SARS-CoV-2 virus and the question remains open. In the third and last part of this work, we examine the question referring to the origin of pandemics. In this context we have examined the hypothesis that the observed climate warming in Siberia and the Arctic and the thawing of permafrost could result to the release of trapped in the permafrost pathogens in the atmosphere. We find that although such relations cannot be directly justified, they present a possible horrifying mechanism for the origin of viruses in the future during the developing global warming of our planet in the decades to come. Overall the findings of our study indicate that: (1) the reduction of anthropogenic emissions in Europe during the "anthropopause" period of March and April 2020 was significant, but when the lockdown measures were raised the concentrations of atmospheric pollutants quickly recovered to pre-pandemic levels and therefore any possible climatic feedbacks were negligible; (2) no robust relationship between atmospheric parameters and the spread of COVID-19 cases can be justified in the warmer part of the year and (3) more research needs to be done regarding the possible links between climate change and the release of new pathogens from thawing of permafrost areas.

Indexed as

Air qualityAnthropopauseClimate changeCOVID-19Pandemics

Identifiers

PMID33230388
PMCPMC7673974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.