ReviewNature biomedical engineering2023
Restoration of sensory information via bionic hands.
Review in Nature biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
80 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial referred sensation in upper and lower limb prosthesis users: a systematic review.Journal of neural engineering · 2022Pooled it
- A methodological framework for the efficient characterization of peripheral nerve stimulation parameters.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Trial
- Neural Interfaces for Bidirectional Sensory Restoration in Limb Prostheses: Current Evidence and Clinical Translation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Targeting grasp-related cortical areas for intracortical brain-machine interfaces.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Towards neuromorphic neurotechnologies: integrating brain-inspired computing with brain-computer interfaces.npj biomedical innovations · 2026Review
- Coordinated hand movement sensation revealed through an implanted magnetic prosthetic kinesthetic interface.Science advances · 2026Article
- Neuromorphic Technologies for Neuroengineering: From Adaptive Stimulation to SNN-Based Inference and Deployable Biointerfaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Axonal spike-count regimes link spinal cord stimulation periodicity to artificial sensory detection and discrimination in rodents.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Perilesional neuromodulation replaces lost sensorimotor function in persons with spinal cord injury.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- The proprioception illusion can simulate limb movement in persons with limb difference.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Differences and Commonalities of Electrical Stimulation Paradigms After Central Paralysis and Amputation.Artificial organs · 2025Review
- Ultra-conformable tattoo electrodes for providing sensory feedback via transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Stable cortical body maps before and after arm amputation.Nature neuroscience · 2025Article
- Neuromorphic electronic tactile system for human-level tactile feedback.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025Article
- Evoking stable and precise tactile sensations via multi-electrode intracortical microstimulation of the somatosensory cortex.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Moving beyond single-electrode intracortical-microstimulation-evoked tactile perception.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Optimization frameworks for bespoke sensory encoding in neuroprosthetics.APL bioengineering · 2025Article
- A worldwide research overview of Artificial Proprioception in prosthetics.PLOS digital health · 2025Review
- The Next Frontier in Neuroprosthetics: Integration of Biomimetic Somatosensory Feedback.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Assessing the utility of Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces (RPNIs) in providing referred sensations in a functional task in a virtual environment.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2025Article
20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Individuals who have lost the use of their hands because of amputation or spinal cord injury can use prosthetic hands to restore their independence. A dexterous prosthesis requires the acquisition of control signals that drive the movements of the robotic hand, and the transmission of sensory signals to convey information to the user about the consequences of these movements. In this Review, we describe non-invasive and invasive technologies for conveying artificial sensory feedback through bionic hands, and evaluate the technologies' long-term prospects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.