Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33230265›Full record

ReviewThe ISME journal2021

Engineering rhizobacteria for sustainable agriculture.

Timothy L Haskett, Andrzej Tkacz, Philip S Poole

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The ISME journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Principles for Rigorous Design and Application of Synthetic Microbial Communities.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Bio-Organic Fertilizer withPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Optimizing Conditions forPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. HMolecular plant pathology · 2025
    Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Timothy L HaskettDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3RB, UK. tim.haskett@plants.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4675-6009
Andrzej TkaczDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3RB, UK.
Philip S PooleDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3RB, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5087-6455

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L011484/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R017859/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T006722/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exploitation of plant growth promoting (PGP) rhizobacteria (PGPR) as crop inoculants could propel sustainable intensification of agriculture to feed our rapidly growing population. However, field performance of PGPR is typically inconsistent due to suboptimal rhizosphere colonisation and persistence in foreign soils, promiscuous host-specificity, and in some cases, the existence of undesirable genetic regulation that has evolved to repress PGP traits. While the genetics underlying these problems remain largely unresolved, molecular mechanisms of PGP have been elucidated in rigorous detail. Engineering and subsequent transfer of PGP traits into selected efficacious rhizobacterial isolates or entire bacterial rhizosphere communities now offers a powerful strategy to generate improved PGPR that are tailored for agricultural use. Through harnessing of synthetic plant-to-bacteria signalling, attempts are currently underway to establish exclusive coupling of plant-bacteria interactions in the field, which will be crucial to optimise efficacy and establish biocontainment of engineered PGPR. This review explores the many ecological and biotechnical facets of this research.

Indexed as

Plant RootsSoil MicrobiologyAgriculturePlant DevelopmentRhizosphere

Identifiers

PMID33230265
PMCPMC8114929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.