Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33230259›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Effects of cognitive and motor dual-tasks on oropharyngeal swallowing assessed with FEES in healthy individuals.

Paul Muhle, Inga Claus, Bendix Labeit, Mao Ogawa, Rainer Dziewas, Sonja Suntrup-Krueger, Tobias Warnecke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul MuhleDepartment of Neurology with Institute for Translational Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1; Gebäude A1, 48149, Münster, Germany. paul.muhle@ukmuenster.de.
Inga ClausDepartment of Neurology with Institute for Translational Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1; Gebäude A1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Bendix LabeitDepartment of Neurology with Institute for Translational Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1; Gebäude A1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Mao OgawaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine I, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Rainer DziewasDepartment of Neurology with Institute for Translational Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1; Gebäude A1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Sonja Suntrup-KruegerDepartment of Neurology with Institute for Translational Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1; Gebäude A1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Tobias WarneckeDepartment of Neurology with Institute for Translational Neurology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1; Gebäude A1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
University Hospital Münster · DEFujita Health University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysphagia is frequent in many neurological diseases and gives rise to severe complications such as malnutrition, dehydration and aspiration pneumonia. Therefore, early detection and management of dysphagia is essential and can reduce mortality. This study investigated the effect of cognitive and motor dual-task interference on swallowing in healthy participants, as dual-task effects are reported for other motor tasks such as gait and speech. 27 participants (17 females; 29.2 ± 4.1 years) were included in this prospective study and examined using flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). Using a previously established FEES-based score, the paradigms "baseline swallowing", "cognitive dual-task" and "motor dual-task" were assessed. Scores of the three paradigms were compared using a repetitive measures ANOVA and post-hoc analysis. Mean baseline swallowing score in single task was 5 ± 3. It worsened to 6 ± 5 in the cognitive (p = 0.118), and to 8 ± 5 in the motor dual-task condition (p < 0.001). This change was driven by subclinical worsening of premature bolus spillage and pharyngeal residue. Oropharyngeal swallowing is not exclusively reflexive in nature but requires attention, which leads to motor dual-task interference. This has potential diagnostic and therapeutic implications, e.g. in the early screening for dysphagia or in avoiding dual-task situations while eating.

Indexed as

AdultCognitionDeglutitionDeglutition DisordersEndoscopyFemaleGaitHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPsychomotor PerformanceSpeechTask Performance and AnalysisVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID33230259
PMCPMC7683567
OpenAlexW3110466445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.