Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33230228›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Impact of different scanners and acquisition parameters on robustness of MR radiomics features based on women's cervix.

Honglan Mi, Mingyuan Yuan, Shiteng Suo, Jiejun Cheng, Suqin Li, Shaofeng Duan, Qing Lu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Towards equitable AI in oncology.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Uniqueness of radiomic features in non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Radiomics in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Honglan MiDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Rd, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Mingyuan YuanDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Zhoupu Hospital, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences College, 1500 Zhouyuan Road, PongDong New District, Shanghai, 201318, China.
Shiteng SuoDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Rd, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Jiejun ChengDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Rd, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Suqin LiDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Rd, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Shaofeng DuanGE Healthcare China, Pudong new town, No1, Huatuo road, Shanghai, 210000, China.
Qing LuDepartment of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Rd, Shanghai, 200127, China. drluqingsjtu@163.com.
Renji Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MR Radiomics based on cervical lesions from one single scanner has achieved promising results. However, it is a challenge to achieve clinical translation. Considering multi-scanners and non-uniform scanning parameters from different centers in a real-world medical scenario, we should first identify the influence of such conditions on the robustness of MR radiomics features (RFs) based on the female cervix. In this study, 9 healthy female volunteers were enrolled and 3 kiwis were selected as references. Each of them underwent T2 weighted imaging in three different 3.0-T MR scanners with uniform acquisition parameters, and in one MR scanner with various scanning parameters. A total of 396 RFs were extracted from their images with and without decile intensity normalization. The RFs' reproducibility was evaluated by coefficient of variation (CV) and quartile coefficient of dispersion (QCD). Representative features were selected using the hierarchical cluster analysis and their discrimination abilities were estimated by ROC analysis through retrospective comparison with the junctional zone and the outer muscular layer of healthy cervix in patients (n = 58) with leiomyoma. This study showed that only a few RFs were robust across different MR scanners and acquisition parameters based on females' cervix, which might be improved by decile intensity normalization method.

Indexed as

Phantoms, ImagingAdultCervix UteriCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLeiomyomaMagnetic Resonance ImagingObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID33230228
PMCPMC7684312
OpenAlexW3109144530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.