Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33230131›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Common and distinct neural representations of aversive somatic and visceral stimulation in healthy individuals.

Lukas Van Oudenhove, Philip A Kragel, Patrick Dupont, Huynh Giao Ly, Els Pazmany, Paul Enzlin, Amandine Rubio, Chantal Delon-Martin, Bruno Bonaz, Qasim Aziz and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07209566 (The Effect of Vaginal Somatovisceral Pain on Hip Extension Mobility and Strength in Women at Mid-cycle With Dysmenorrhea vs. Controls), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07209566 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Vaginal Somatovisceral Pain on Hip Extension Mobility and Strength in Women at Mid-cycle With Dysmenorrhea vs. Controls: A Case-control Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzusa Pacific UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsDysmenorrhea, Dysmenorrhea Primary, Visceral Pain, Menstrual PainArmsVisceral Pain Stimulus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Action-mode subnetworks for decision-making, action control, and feedback.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The brain's action-mode network.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lukas Van OudenhoveLaboratory for Brain-Gut Axis Studies (LaBGAS), Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism, and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Philip A KragelDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience and the Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9463-6381
Patrick DupontLaboratory for Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1980-2540
Huynh Giao LyLaboratory for Brain-Gut Axis Studies (LaBGAS), Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism, and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Els PazmanyInterfaculty Institute for Family and Sexuality Studies, Department of Neurosciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Paul EnzlinInterfaculty Institute for Family and Sexuality Studies, Department of Neurosciences, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Amandine RubioGrenoble Institute of Neuroscience, University of Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Chantal Delon-MartinGrenoble Institute of Neuroscience, University of Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0766-0346
Bruno BonazGrenoble Institute of Neuroscience, University of Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Qasim AzizBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Wingate Institute of Neurogastroenterology, Centre for Neuroscience and Trauma, Blizzard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Jan TackGastrointestinal Motility and Sensitivity Research Group, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism, and Ageing, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Shin FukudoBehavioral Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2265-0349
Michiko KanoBehavioral Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Tor D WagerCognitive and Affective Neuroscience Lab, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. tor.d.wager@dartmouth.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1936-5574

Funding

The Neural Bases of Placebo Effects and their Relation to Regulatory ProcessesR01MH076136 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI WAGER, TOR D. · 2007 to 2023
$8.5M
fMRI-based Biomarkers for Multiple Components of PainR01DA035484 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI WAGER, TOR D. · 2013 to 2017
$3.1M
The neural bases of placebo effects and their relation to regulatory processesR37MH076136 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI TOR D. WAGER · 2024 to 2026
$2.4M
Learning to avoid pain: Computational mechanisms and application to methamphetamiR01DA027794 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI WAGER, TOR D. · 2009 to 2013
$1.7M
Neuroimaging-based biomarkers for two components of painRC1DA028608 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI SMITH, EDWARD E. · 2009 to 2010
$999k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA027794NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035484NIDA NIH HHS RC1 DA028608NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH076136NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH076136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different pain types may be encoded in different brain circuits. Here, we examine similarities and differences in brain processing of visceral and somatic pain. We analyze data from seven fMRI studies (N = 165) and five types of pain and discomfort (esophageal, gastric, and rectal distension, cutaneous thermal stimulation, and vulvar pressure) to establish and validate generalizable pain representations. We first evaluate an established multivariate brain measure, the Neurologic Pain Signature (NPS), as a common nociceptive pain system across pain types. Then, we develop a multivariate classifier to distinguish visceral from somatic pain. The NPS responds robustly in 98% of participants across pain types, correlates with perceived intensity of visceral pain and discomfort, and shows specificity to pain when compared with cognitive and affective conditions from twelve additional studies (N = 180). Pre-defined signatures for non-pain negative affect do not respond to visceral pain. The visceral versus the somatic classifier reliably distinguishes somatic (thermal) from visceral (rectal) stimulation in both cross-validation and independent cohorts. Other pain types reflect mixtures of somatic and visceral patterns. These results validate the NPS as measuring a common core nociceptive pain system across pain types, and provide a new classifier for visceral versus somatic pain.

Indexed as

AdultAffectBrainBrain MappingCognitionDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetNociceptive PainVisceral Pain

Identifiers

PMID33230131
PMCPMC7684294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.