ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2020
Repeatability of Orbscan III for anterior segment parameters in normal eyes.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comments on: Repeatability of Orbscan III for anterior segment parameters in normal eyes.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Response to comments on: Repeatability of Orbscan III for anterior segment parameters in normal eyes.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAssessment of repeatability of Orbscan III in measuring steep keratometry (sKm), flat keratometry (fKm), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), white-to-white diameter (WTW) and 3 mm and 5 mm zonal irregularity in healthy eyes.
methodsIn this prospective observatioanl study 100 eyes of 50 participants underwent three consecutive scans on Orbscan III by a single examiner with a gap of 5 minutes between scans. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the repeatability of sKm, fKm, TCT, WTW, ACD and parameters of 3- and 5 mm irregularity. Within subject standard deviation (Sw), coefficient of variation (CoV) and test retest variability (TRT) was calculated for the commonly used parameters. WERE THE MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES.: The repeatability of sKm, fKm, TCT, WTW, ACD, 3 mm and 5 mm zonal irregularity on Orbscan III.
resultsTotal of 50 patients (25 male and 25 female) who fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria were assessed. sKm, fKm, TCT and WTW were found to have a TRT of 0.31, 0.29. 21.5 and 0.27, respectively, and the ICC values were found to be over 0.9, denoting high repeatability. Repeat measurements of parameters of irregularity and ACD were found to be statistically similar, again denoting similarity between repeat measurements.
conclusionOrbscan III provides repeatable measurements of Sim-k, anterior chamber depth, thinnest corneal thickness, 3 mm and 5 mm zonal irregularity and white-to-white diameter in healthy eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.