ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2020
Phakic intraocular lens: Getting the right size.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Repositioning of Vertical Implantable Phakic Contact Lens.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Direct Measurement of the Ciliary Sulcus Diameter Using Optical Coherence Tomography-Inter-Rater Variability.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Automated expert-level scleral spur detection and quantitative biometric analysis on the ANTERION anterior segment OCT system.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Exploring Nomograms for Implantable Collamer Lens Size Selection in Myopia: A Literature-based Compilation.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Review
- Comparison Study of the Two Biometers Based on Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Technology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Effect of Light Conditions and Accommodation on Implantable Phakic Contact Lens Vault by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Article
- Keratoconus: exploring fundamentals and future perspectives - a comprehensive systematic review.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phakic intraocular lenses (IOL) are a boon for patients who want spectacle independence but are unable to get refractive correction through laser platforms due to high refractive error or certain corneal contraindications. Phakic IOL's (PIOL) have their own set of complications and challenges, the most important being getting the sizing right. This paper attempts to solve the problem of accurate sizing of PIOL's. Parameters needed for calculating the ideal size of PIOL's have been studied in a step by step manner using all possible tools depending upon the availability and preference of the surgeon. The pros and cons of using a particular tool for measurements have been highlighted along with illustrative case examples to help surgeons who are starting PIOL implantation surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.