Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33229552›Full record

Observational studyProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Local reliability weighting explains identification of partially masked objects in natural images.

Stephen Sebastian, Eric S Seemiller, Wilson S Geisler

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Detection of targets in filtered noise: whitening in space and spatial frequency.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The brain produces mind by modeling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephen SebastianCenter for Perceptual Systems and Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.
Eric S SeemillerCenter for Perceptual Systems and Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.
Wilson S GeislerCenter for Perceptual Systems and Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712 w.geisler@utexas.edu.

Funding

PERCEPTUAL ORGANIZATION OF TWO DIMENSIONAL PATTERNSR01EY011747 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI GEISLER, WILSON S · 1997 to 2022
$6.4M
Visual Search and Detection in Natural ScenesR01EY024662 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI GEISLER, WILSON S · 2015 to 2022
$2.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011747NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental natural visual task is the identification of specific target objects in the environments that surround us. It has long been known that some properties of the background have strong effects on target visibility. The most well-known properties are the luminance, contrast, and similarity of the background to the target. In previous studies, we found that these properties have highly lawful effects on detection in natural backgrounds. However, there is another important factor affecting detection in natural backgrounds that has received little or no attention in the masking literature, which has been concerned with detection in simpler backgrounds. Namely, in natural backgrounds the properties of the background often vary under the target, and hence some parts of the target are masked more than others. We began studying this factor, which we call the "partial masking factor," by measuring detection thresholds in backgrounds of contrast-modulated white noise that was constructed so that the standard template-matching (TM) observer performs equally well whether or not the noise contrast modulates in the target region. If noise contrast is uniform in the target region, then this TM observer is the Bayesian optimal observer. However, when the noise contrast modulates then the Bayesian optimal observer weights the template at each pixel location by the estimated reliability at that location. We find that human performance for modulated noise backgrounds is predicted by this reliability-weighted TM (RTM) observer. More surprisingly, we find that human performance for natural backgrounds is also predicted by the RTM observer.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalArtifactsBayes TheoremHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNormal DistributionPattern Recognition, VisualPerceptual MaskingPhotic Stimulationdetectionmaskingnatural scene statisticsnormalizationreliability weighting

Identifiers

PMID33229552
PMCPMC7703648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.