Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33229545›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Therapeutic candidates for the Zika virus identified by a high-throughput screen for Zika protease inhibitors.

Rachel P M Abrams, Adam Yasgar, Tadahisa Teramoto, Myoung-Hwa Lee, Dorjbal Dorjsuren, Richard T Eastman, Nasir Malik, Alexey V Zakharov, Wenxue Li, Muzna Bachani and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Food science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel P M AbramsNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.ORCID 0000-0003-0256-446X
Adam YasgarNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20850.ORCID 0000-0001-7350-1402
Tadahisa TeramotoDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057.ORCID 0000-0003-3323-9176
Myoung-Hwa LeeNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Dorjbal DorjsurenNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20850.
Richard T EastmanNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20850.ORCID 0000-0003-3580-380X
Nasir MalikNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Alexey V ZakharovNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20850.
Wenxue LiNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Muzna BachaniNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Kyle BrimacombeNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20850.
Joseph P SteinerNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Matthew D HallNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20850.ORCID 0000-0002-5073-442X
Anuradha BalasubramanianDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057.
Ajit JadhavNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20850.
Radhakrishnan PadmanabhanDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057 rp55@georgetown.edu asimeono@mail.nih.gov natha@ninds.nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-9527-9988
Anton SimeonovNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20850; rp55@georgetown.edu asimeono@mail.nih.gov natha@ninds.nih.gov.
Avindra NathNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; rp55@georgetown.edu asimeono@mail.nih.gov natha@ninds.nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0003-0927-5855
National Institutes of Health · USGeorgetown University · US

Funding

NINDS Office of the Clinical DirectorZIDNS003101 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI NATH, AVINDRA · 2009 to 2025
$219.6M
Identification of inhibitors of Zika Protease (NS2B-NS3)ZIATR000291 · NCATS · NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES · PI SIMEONOV, ANTON · 2017 to 2020
$583k
Development of West Nile Virus/Broad Spectrum Flavivirus Protease InhibitorsR21AI109185 · NIAID · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI PADMANABHAN, RADHAKRISHNAN · 2014 to 2015
$421k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA TR000291Intramural NIH HHS ZID NS003101NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI109185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When Zika virus emerged as a public health emergency there were no drugs or vaccines approved for its prevention or treatment. We used a high-throughput screen for Zika virus protease inhibitors to identify several inhibitors of Zika virus infection. We expressed the NS2B-NS3 Zika virus protease and conducted a biochemical screen for small-molecule inhibitors. A quantitative structure-activity relationship model was employed to virtually screen ∼138,000 compounds, which increased the identification of active compounds, while decreasing screening time and resources. Candidate inhibitors were validated in several viral infection assays. Small molecules with favorable clinical profiles, especially the five-lipoxygenase-activating protein inhibitor, MK-591, inhibited the Zika virus protease and infection in neural stem cells. Members of the tetracycline family of antibiotics were more potent inhibitors of Zika virus infection than the protease, suggesting they may have multiple mechanisms of action. The most potent tetracycline, methacycline, reduced the amount of Zika virus present in the brain and the severity of Zika virus-induced motor deficits in an immunocompetent mouse model. As Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs, the tetracyclines could be quickly translated to the clinic. The compounds identified through our screening paradigm have the potential to be used as prophylactics for patients traveling to endemic regions or for the treatment of the neurological complications of Zika virus infection.

Indexed as

Drug Evaluation, PreclinicalHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysAnimalsAntiviral AgentsArtificial IntelligenceChlorocebus aethiopsDisease Models, AnimalImmunocompetenceInhibitory Concentration 50MethacyclineMice, Inbred C57BLProtease InhibitorsQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipSmall Molecule LibrariesVero CellsZika VirusAntiviral AgentsMethacyclineProtease InhibitorsSmall Molecule Librariesencephalitisflavivirushigh-throughput screeningserine proteaseZika virus

Identifiers

PMID33229545
PMCPMC7733812
OpenAlexW3107473374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.