ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020
A general model of hippocampal and dorsal striatal learning and decision making.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic Hippocampal-Striatal Information Flow Accompanies Behavioral Strategy Transitions During Sequential Learning in Pigeons: A Preliminary Study.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Context-Aware Evidence-Gated Plasticity for Multi-Goal Learning in Spiking Neural Networks.Research square · 2026Article
- Context-Aware Evidence-Gated Plasticity for Multi-Goal Learning in Spiking Neural Networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Apelin-13 confers Neuropeptide Y-mediated neuroprotection and preserves learning and allocentric memory in D-glutamic acid-induced excitotoxicity in rats.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Article
- Review
- Composing egocentric and allocentric maps for flexible navigation.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Hippocampus supports multi-task reinforcement learning under partial observability.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Impact of symmetry in local learning rules on predictive neural representations and generalization in spatial navigation.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Neural evidence that humans reuse strategies to solve new tasks.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Noise Resilience of Successor and Predecessor Feature Algorithms in One- and Two-Dimensional Environments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Actor-critic networks with analogue memristors mimicking reward-based learning.Nature machine intelligence · 2025Article
- A recurrent network model of planning explains hippocampal replay and human behavior.Nature neuroscience · 2024Article
- An Integrated Platform foreNeuro · 2023Article
- An Integrated Platform for in vivo Electrophysiology in Spatial Cognition Experiments.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Article
- A model for transforming egocentric views into goal-directed behavior.Hippocampus · 2023Article
- Control of contextual memory through interneuronal α5-GABAPNAS nexus · 2023Article
- Distinct mesoscale cortical dynamics encode search strategies during spatial navigation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Neural learning rules for generating flexible predictions and computing the successor representation.eLife · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans and other animals use multiple strategies for making decisions. Reinforcement-learning theory distinguishes between stimulus-response (model-free; MF) learning and deliberative (model-based; MB) planning. The spatial-navigation literature presents a parallel dichotomy between navigation strategies. In "response learning," associated with the dorsolateral striatum (DLS), decisions are anchored to an egocentric reference frame. In "place learning," associated with the hippocampus, decisions are anchored to an allocentric reference frame. Emerging evidence suggests that the contribution of hippocampus to place learning may also underlie its contribution to MB learning by representing relational structure in a cognitive map. Here, we introduce a computational model in which hippocampus subserves place and MB learning by learning a "successor representation" of relational structure between states; DLS implements model-free response learning by learning associations between actions and egocentric representations of landmarks; and action values from either system are weighted by the reliability of its predictions. We show that this model reproduces a range of seemingly disparate behavioral findings in spatial and nonspatial decision tasks and explains the effects of lesions to DLS and hippocampus on these tasks. Furthermore, modeling place cells as driven by boundaries explains the observation that, unlike navigation guided by landmarks, navigation guided by boundaries is robust to "blocking" by prior state-reward associations due to learned associations between place cells. Our model, originally shaped by detailed constraints in the spatial literature, successfully characterizes the hippocampal-striatal system as a general system for decision making via adaptive combination of stimulus-response learning and the use of a cognitive map.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.