Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33229535›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Bumblebees perceive the spatial layout of their environment in relation to their body size and form to minimize inflight collisions.

Sridhar Ravi, Tim Siesenop, Olivier Bertrand, Liang Li, Charlotte Doussot, William H Warren, Stacey A Combes, Martin Egelhaaf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effects of object motion on visual acuity in honeybees.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The exploration of consciousness in insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Body Size Awareness and Modular Self-Representation in Reedfish (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Visual physiology of Australian stingless bees.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Ants combine object affordance with latent learning to make efficient foraging decisions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Optic flow based spatial vision in insects.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Review
  18. The potential underlying mechanisms during learning flights.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sridhar RaviDepartment of Neurobiology and Cognitive Interaction Technology Center of Excellence, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany; sridhar.ravi@adfa.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-7397-9713
Tim SiesenopDepartment of Neurobiology and Cognitive Interaction Technology Center of Excellence, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
Olivier BertrandDepartment of Neurobiology and Cognitive Interaction Technology Center of Excellence, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0889-4550
Liang LiDepartment of Collective Behavior, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, 78464 Konstanz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2447-6295
Charlotte DoussotDepartment of Neurobiology and Cognitive Interaction Technology Center of Excellence, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.
William H WarrenDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic & Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912.ORCID 0000-0003-4843-2315
Stacey A CombesDepartment of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.ORCID 0000-0003-1586-6459
Martin EgelhaafDepartment of Neurobiology and Cognitive Interaction Technology Center of Excellence, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9336-4270

Funding

A vision-based model of locomotion in crowded environmentsR01EY029745 · NEI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI WARREN, WILLIAM H · 2019 to 2023
$2.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals that move through complex habitats must frequently contend with obstacles in their path. Humans and other highly cognitive vertebrates avoid collisions by perceiving the relationship between the layout of their surroundings and the properties of their own body profile and action capacity. It is unknown whether insects, which have much smaller brains, possess such abilities. We used bumblebees, which vary widely in body size and regularly forage in dense vegetation, to investigate whether flying insects consider their own size when interacting with their surroundings. Bumblebees trained to fly in a tunnel were sporadically presented with an obstructing wall containing a gap that varied in width. Bees successfully flew through narrow gaps, even those that were much smaller than their wingspans, by first performing lateral scanning (side-to-side flights) to visually assess the aperture. Bees then reoriented their in-flight posture (i.e., yaw or heading angle) while passing through, minimizing their projected frontal width and mitigating collisions; in extreme cases, bees flew entirely sideways through the gap. Both the time that bees spent scanning during their approach and the extent to which they reoriented themselves to pass through the gap were determined not by the absolute size of the gap, but by the size of the gap relative to each bee's own wingspan. Our findings suggest that, similar to humans and other vertebrates, flying bumblebees perceive the affordance of their surroundings relative their body size and form to navigate safely through complex environments.

Indexed as

Body SizeAnimalsBeesFlight, AnimalTime FactorsVideo RecordingWings, Animalaffordancescluttered environmentsinsect flightnavigationself-size perception

Identifiers

PMID33229535
PMCPMC7733852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.