Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33229524›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Moth wings are acoustic metamaterials.

Thomas R Neil, Zhiyuan Shen, Daniel Robert, Bruce W Drinkwater, Marc W Holderied

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Moth-Wing-Inspired Multifunctional Metamaterials.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Buckling-induced sound production in the aeroelastic tymbals ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Models for resonant acoustic metasurfaces with application to moth wing ultrasound absorption.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Moth wings as sound absorber metasurface.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. In vivo visualization of butterfly scale cell morphogenesis inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. New lessons for stealth technology.Nature materials · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas R NeilSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom.
Zhiyuan ShenSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom.
Daniel RobertSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5907-3912
Bruce W DrinkwaterDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TR, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8307-1175
Marc W HolderiedSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom; marc.holderied@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1573-7908
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C518522/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I009671/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N009991/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metamaterials assemble multiple subwavelength elements to create structures with extraordinary physical properties (1-4). Optical metamaterials are rare in nature and no natural acoustic metamaterials are known. Here, we reveal that the intricate scale layer on moth wings forms a metamaterial ultrasound absorber (peak absorption = 72% of sound intensity at 78 kHz) that is 111 times thinner than the longest absorbed wavelength. Individual scales act as resonant (5) unit cells that are linked via a shared wing membrane to form this metamaterial, and collectively they generate hard-to-attain broadband deep-subwavelength absorption. Their collective absorption exceeds the sum of their individual contributions. This sound absorber provides moth wings with acoustic camouflage (6) against echolocating bats. It combines broadband absorption of all frequencies used by bats with light and ultrathin structures that meet aerodynamic constraints on wing weight and thickness. The morphological implementation seen in this evolved acoustic metamaterial reveals enticing ways to design high-performance noise mitigation devices.

Indexed as

AcousticsEcholocationPhysical PhenomenaAnimalsChiropteraComputer SimulationManufactured MaterialsMothsSoundWings, Animalacousticsbiosonarmoth scalenatural metamaterialultrasonic

Identifiers

PMID33229524
PMCPMC7733855
OpenAlexW3097088152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.