Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33229521›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Rational thoughts in neural codes.

Zhengwei Wu, Minhae Kwon, Saurabh Daptardar, Paul Schrater, Xaq Pitkow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neural representations of beliefs in a multi-dimensional inference task.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sensory Evidence Accumulation Using Optic Flow in a Naturalistic Navigation Task.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Inverse Rational Control with Partially Observable Continuous Nonlinear Dynamics.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2020
    Article
  14. The brain produces mind by modeling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhengwei WuDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030.
Minhae KwonDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030.
Saurabh DaptardarDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rice University, Houston, TX 77030.
Paul SchraterDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Xaq PitkowDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030; xaq@rice.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6376-329X

Funding

Dynamic network computations for foraging in an uncertain environmentU01NS094368 · NINDS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ANGELAKI, DORA, DRAGOI, VALENTIN · 2015 to 2017
$3.8M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS094368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Models, PsychologicalRationalizationAnimalsBrainCognitionComputer SimulationDecision MakingFeeding BehaviorMarkov ChainsNeural Networks, ComputerRewardUncertaintycognitioncomputationneural codingneurosciencerational

Identifiers

PMID33229521
PMCPMC7703629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.