Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33228725›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2020

Capacity of National Malaria Control Programmes to implement vector surveillance: a global analysis.

Tanya L Russell, Robert Farlow, Myo Min, Effie Espino, Abraham Mnzava, Thomas R Burkot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tanya L RussellAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia. tanya.russell@jcu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0920-6844
Robert FarlowR. Farlow Consulting LLC, Burkeville, TX, USA.
Myo MinAsia-Pacific Malaria Elimination Network, Singapore, Singapore.
Effie EspinoAsia-Pacific Malaria Elimination Network, Singapore, Singapore.
Abraham MnzavaAfrican Leaders' Malaria Alliance, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Thomas R BurkotAustralian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1174142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSolving the problem of malaria requires a highly skilled workforce with robust infrastructure, financial backing and sound programme management coordinated by a strategic plan. Here, the capacity of National Malaria Control Programmes (NMCPs) was analysed to identify the strengths and weaknesses underpinning the implementation of vector surveillance and control activities by the core elements of programme capacity, being strategic frameworks, financing, human resources, logistics and infrastructure, and information systems.

resultsAcross nearly every country surveyed, the vector surveillance programmes were hampered by a lack of capacity and capability. Only 8% of NMCPs reported having sufficient capacity to implement vector surveillance. In contrast, 57%, 56% and 28% of NMCPs had the capacity to implement long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), indoor residual spraying (IRS) and larval source management (LSM) activities, respectively. Largely underlying this was a lack of up-to-date strategic plans that prioritize vector surveillance and include frameworks for decision-making and action.

conclusionsStrategic planning and a lack of well-trained entomologists heavily hamper vector surveillance. Countries on the path to elimination generally had more operational/field staff compared to countries at the stage of control, and also were more likely to have an established system for staff training and capacity building. It is unlikely that controlling countries will make significant progress unless huge investments also go towards increasing the number and capacity of programmatic staff.

Indexed as

Epidemiological MonitoringMosquito VectorsMalariaMosquito ControlNational Health ProgramsPopulation SurveillanceAnophelesCapacity buildingLogic frameworkMalariaNeeds AssessmentVector surveillance

Identifiers

PMID33228725
PMCPMC7682121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.