ArticleBMC medicine2020
Adverse effects of Z-drugs for sleep disturbance in people living with dementia: a population-based cohort study.
Article in BMC medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Benzodiazepines or related drugs and risk of cardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2026Pooled it
- Joint Clinical Practice Guideline on Benzodiazepine Tapering: Considerations When Risks Outweigh Benefits.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Guideline
- Dementia and Sleep Disorders: The Effects of Drug Therapy in a Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Stakeholders' views on the use of psychotropic medication in older people: a systematic review.Age and ageing · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Impact of the iWHELD digital person-centered care program on quality of life, agitation and psychotropic medications in people with dementia living in nursing homes during the COVID-19 pandemic: A randomized controlled trial.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Dual orexin receptor antagonist-assisted dose reduction of benzodiazepines and benzodiazepine receptor agonists: a mirror-image analysis of insurance claims data.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026Article
- Response to commentary "Hypnotic-associated falls across the diurnal cycle: Pharmacokinetic signal or delirium rhythm?"Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026Article
- Hypnotic-associated falls across the diurnal cycle: Pharmacokinetic signal or delirium rhythm?Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026Article
- How does diagnostic subtype affect the quality of primary care for people with dementia? A retrospective cohort study in 1490 English general practices.Age and ageing · 2026Article
- TaIlored ManagEment of Sleep (TIMES) for people with dementia and mild cognitive impairment in primary care in England: protocol for a feasibility cluster-randomised controlled trial.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2026Article
- Pharmacological management in frontotemporal dementia and patient outcomes: a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX platform.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Benefits and risks of sleep medication in individuals with hypertension and sleep disturbance: evidence from a large population-based study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Sleep Disorders in Neurodegenerative Diseases with Dementia: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Influence of Ageing on the Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Chronically Administered Medicines in Geriatric Patients: A Review.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2025Review
- Sundowning Syndrome in Dementia: Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Medications and cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease: Cohort cluster analysis of 15,428 patients.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Article
- Psychotropic Drug Use and Associated Factors Among Acutely Admitted Older People: A Cross-Sectional Study of a Clinical Sample.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2024Article
- Inequalities in the Quality and Safety of Post-Diagnostic Primary Care for People With Dementia: A Scoping Review.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSleep disturbance is common in dementia and often treated with Z-drugs (zopiclone, zaleplon, and zolpidem). While some observational studies suggest that Z-drugs are associated with adverse events such as falls and fracture risks in older people, this has not been studied in dementia.
methodsWe used data from 27,090 patients diagnosed with dementia between January 2000 and March 2016 from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to Hospital Episodes Statistics data in England. We compared adverse events for 3532 patients newly prescribed Z-drugs by time-varying dosage to (1) 1833 non-sedative-users with sleep disturbance; (2) 10,214 non-sedative-users with proximal GP consultation matched on age, sex, and antipsychotic use; and (3) 5172 patients newly prescribed benzodiazepines. We defined higher dose Z-drugs and benzodiazepines as prescriptions equivalent to ≥ 7.5 mg zopiclone or > 5 mg diazepam daily. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for incident fracture, hip fracture, fall, mortality, acute bacterial infection, ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack, and venous thromboembolism over a 2-year follow-up, adjusted for demographic- and health-related covariates.
resultsThe mean (SD) age of patients was 83 (7.7) years, and 16,802 (62%) were women. Of 3532 patients prescribed Z-drugs, 584 (17%) were initiated at higher doses. For patients prescribed higher dose Z-drugs relative to non-users with sleep disturbance, the HRs (95% confidence interval) for fractures, hip fractures, falls, and ischaemic stroke were 1.67 (1.13-2.46), 1.96 (1.16-3.31), 1.33 (1.06-1.66), and 1.88 (1.14-3.10), respectively. We observed similar associations when compared to non-sedative-users with proximal GP consultation. Minimal or inconsistent excess risks were observed at ≤ 3.75 mg zopiclone or equivalent daily, and for mortality, infection, and venous thromboembolism. We observed no differences in adverse events for Z-drugs compared to benzodiazepines, except lower mortality rates with Z-drugs (HR [95% confidence interval] of 0.73 [0.64-0.83]).
conclusionsHigher dose Z-drug use in dementia is associated with increased fracture and stroke risks, similar or greater to that for higher dose benzodiazepines. Higher dose Z-drugs should be avoided, if possible, in people living with dementia, and non-pharmacological alternatives preferentially considered. Prescriptions for higher dose Z-drugs in dementia should be regularly reviewed.
trial registrationENCePP e-register of studies, EUPAS18006.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.